<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Minnesota Public Utilities Commission - File #: Details 2026-059</title><link>https://minnesotapuc.legistar.com/Gateway.aspx?M=LD&amp;From=RSS&amp;ID=7982668&amp;GUID=EAAB7508-2D59-44D9-BA69-4401CC3980BF</link><description /><generator>Legistar</generator><ttl>15</ttl><atom:link href="https://minnesotapuc.legistar.com/Feed.ashx?GUID=EAAB7508-2D59-44D9-BA69-4401CC3980BF&amp;ID=7982668&amp;M=LD" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" /><item><title>Minnesota Public Utilities Commission - File #: Details 2026-059</title><link>https://minnesotapuc.legistar.com/Gateway.aspx?M=LD&amp;From=RSS&amp;ID=7982668&amp;GUID=EAAB7508-2D59-44D9-BA69-4401CC3980BF</link><guid isPermaLink="false">EAAB7508-2D59-44D9-BA69-4401CC3980BF-2026-05-07-20-13-59</guid><description>Title: ***	E002/AA-22-179	Northern States Power Co. d/b/a Xcel Energy
In the Matter of Xcel Energy’s Petition for Approval of its 2023 Annual Fuel Forecast and Monthly Fuel Cost Charges.

1.	What is the appropriate amount of replacement power costs incurred by Xcel Energy to serve its Minnesota customers as a result of the October 2023 Prairie Island outage?
2.	Whether any demonstrated customer benefits or offsets should reduce the replacement power refund otherwise owed to customers, and if so, in what amount?
3.	Should Xcel Energy be allowed to recover its contested case litigation costs from ratepayers? (PUC: Mohamed)</description><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 20:13:59 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>