<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Minnesota Public Utilities Commission - File #: Details 2026-148</title><link>https://minnesotapuc.legistar.com/Gateway.aspx?M=LD&amp;From=RSS&amp;ID=8154676&amp;GUID=F20B72EE-2822-438B-AB1C-B4F9A469935F</link><description /><generator>Legistar</generator><ttl>15</ttl><atom:link href="https://minnesotapuc.legistar.com/Feed.ashx?GUID=F20B72EE-2822-438B-AB1C-B4F9A469935F&amp;ID=8154676&amp;M=LD" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" /><item><title>Minnesota Public Utilities Commission - File #: Details 2026-148</title><link>https://minnesotapuc.legistar.com/Gateway.aspx?M=LD&amp;From=RSS&amp;ID=8154676&amp;GUID=F20B72EE-2822-438B-AB1C-B4F9A469935F</link><guid isPermaLink="false">F20B72EE-2822-438B-AB1C-B4F9A469935F-2026-08-07-15-53-52</guid><description>Title: *	IP7180/ESS-26-184	LSP CG Storage, LLC
In the Matter of the Application of LSP CG Storage for a Site Permit for the up to 80 MW Cottage Grove BESS Project in Cottage Grove, Washington County, Minnesota.

1.	Should the Commission require an addendum to the Environmental Assessment (EA) for the project?  
2.	If an addendum is required, should the Commission authorize the Executive Secretary to approve the scope of an EA addendum?
3.	If an addendum is required, should the Commission extend the six-month statutory deadline for the Commission to make a decision (not to exceed nine months)?
4.	Should the Commission issue the draft site permit prepared by Energy Infrastructure Permitting Staff (PUC EIP staff), including?the proposed?special permit conditions?
5.	Should the Commission?request?that an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) from the Court of Administrative Hearings (CAH) conduct public hearings for the project and prepare a summary of public testimony as expeditiously as possible?? (PUC: Harvieux; Livingston)</description><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 15:53:52 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>