<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Minnesota Public Utilities Commission - File #: Details 2025-002</title><link>https://minnesotapuc.legistar.com/Gateway.aspx?M=LD&amp;From=RSS&amp;ID=7086953&amp;GUID=39BB0E57-ACF3-43CB-8BAC-C4FAABB2DECE</link><description /><generator>Legistar</generator><ttl>15</ttl><atom:link href="https://minnesotapuc.legistar.com/Feed.ashx?M=LD&amp;ID=7086953&amp;GUID=39BB0E57-ACF3-43CB-8BAC-C4FAABB2DECE" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" /><item><title>Minnesota Public Utilities Commission - File #: Details 2025-002</title><link>https://minnesotapuc.legistar.com/Gateway.aspx?M=LD&amp;From=RSS&amp;ID=7086953&amp;GUID=39BB0E57-ACF3-43CB-8BAC-C4FAABB2DECE</link><guid isPermaLink="false">39BB0E57-ACF3-43CB-8BAC-C4FAABB2DECE-2026-08-05-20-46-01</guid><description>Title: ***	IP7138/ESS-24-294;	Midwater BESS, LLC
	IP7138/TL-24-295
In the Matter of the Joint Application of Midwater BESS, LLC for a Site Permit and Route Permit for the up to 150 MW Midwater Energy Storage Project and Associated 161 kV Transmission Line in Freeborn County, Minnesota.

1.	Should the Commission adopt the Administrative Law Judge’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendations? 
2.	Should the Commission find that the environmental assessment and the record created at the public hearings address the issues identified in the scoping decision?
3.	Should the Commission issue a site permit for the 150 MW energy storage system?
4.	Should the Commission issue a route permit for the 161 kV transmission line? (PUC: Harvieux)</description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 20:46:01 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>