File #: Details 2018-090    Version: 1 Name:
Type: M - Miscellaneous Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 5/3/2018 In control: PUC Agenda Meeting
On agenda: 5/24/2018 Final action:
Title: * P431/AM-17-835; West Central Telephone; P409/M-17-837; Garden Valley Telephone Cooperative; P530/M-17-838; Halstad Telephone Company; P432/M-17-854 Paul Bunyan Telephone Cooperative In the Matter of Petitions for Eligible Telecommunications Carrier (ETC) Designation in Minnesota. 1. Should the Commission approve the requests for ETC designation in Minnesota for purposes of providing local services under the Lifeline program? 2. Should the Commission refer questions regarding service availability, excess construction costs, and reporting to be addressed in Docket P999/CI-17-509? (PUC: McCarthy)
Attachments: 1. West Central Petition for ETC Designation (170835) 11-30-17, 2. Department Comments on West Central Petition (17-835) 2-27-18, 3. DOC Supplemental Comments 3-22-18, 4. Garden Valley Petition for ETC Designation (17-837) 12-1-17, 5. DOC Comments on Garden Valley Petition (17-837) 2-5-18, 6. DOC Revised Comments on Garden Valley Petition (17-837) 2-13-18, 7. Halstad Petition for ETC Designation (17-838) 12-1-17, 8. DOC Comments on Halstad Petition (17-838) 2-7-18, 9. Halstad Reply Comments Opposing DOC Recommendations (17-838) 2-9-18, 10. Paul Bunyan Petition for ETC Designation (17-854) 12-6-17, 11. DOC Comments on Paul Bunyan Petition (17-854) 3-19-18, 12. DOC Correction to Citation 5-11-18, 13. Briefing Papers

title

*                     P431/AM-17-835;                     West Central Telephone;

                     P409/M-17-837;                     Garden Valley Telephone Cooperative;

                     P530/M-17-838;                     Halstad Telephone Company;

                     P432/M-17-854                     Paul Bunyan Telephone Cooperative

In the Matter of Petitions for Eligible Telecommunications Carrier (ETC) Designation in Minnesota.

 

1.                     Should the Commission approve the requests for ETC designation in Minnesota for purposes of providing local services under the Lifeline program?

2.                     Should the Commission refer questions regarding service availability, excess construction costs, and reporting to be addressed in Docket P999/CI-17-509? (PUC: McCarthy)