title
** E015/M-11-409 Minnesota Power
In the Matter of Minnesota Power’s Petition for Approval of a Pilot Rider for Customer Affordability of Residential Electricity.
A. Should the Commission require Minnesota Power (MP) to redesign its Customer Affordability of Residential Electricity (CARE) Program and model it on Xcel Energy’s PowerON Program?
B. Should the Commission authorize MP to make one or more of the following changes to the design of the existing CARE Program?
C. Should the Commission accept Minnesota Power’s Sixth Annual Report on its Pilot Rider for Customer Affordability of Residential Electricity program?
D. Should the Commission authorize or require MP to change or modify the way information is provided in future annual reports?
E. Should the Commission accept MP’s CARE Program customer outreach effort described in its Sixth Annual Report to have adequately addressed the Commission’s concerns on customer outreach as directed in the Commission’s January 5, 2018 Order accepting fifth annual report?
F. Should the Commission remove the CARE Program’s pilot status and reclassify it permanently as a standard rider program?
G. Should the Commission approve MP’s request to continue to be the sole administrator of the CARE program?
H. Should the Commission require a specific date for submission of future CARE Program annual reports? (PUC: Ubani)