File #: Details 2020-080    Version: 1 Name:
Type: GR - General Rate Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 5/18/2020 In control: PUC Agenda Meeting
On agenda: 6/4/2020 Final action:
Title: ** E015/GR-19-442; Minnesota Power E015/M-20-429; E015/M-16-564 In the Matter of the Application of Minnesota Power for Authority to Increase Electric Service Rates in Minnesota; In the Matter of the Emergency Petition of Minnesota Power for Approval to Move Asset-Based Wholesale Sales Credits to the Fuel Adjustment Clause and Resolve Rate Case; In the Matter of Minnesota Power's Revised Petition for a Competitive Rate for Energy-Intensive Trade-Exposed (EITE) Customers and an EITE Cost Recovery Rider. 1. Should the Commission approve Minnesota Power's request to shift recovery of the Company's energy and capacity asset-based wholesale sales margins from base rates to its Fuel Adjustment Clause (FAC or FCA)? 2. Should the Commission approve Minnesota Power's requested mid-year change to its currently approved 2020 FCA? 3. Should the Commission authorize Minnesota Power to change base rates, as requested, as a result of this docket rather than in the rate case? 4. Should the Comm...
Attachments: 1. 1 MP- Petition - 4-23-2020, 2. 2 MP- Petition - 4-23-2020, 3. PUBLIC MP- Supplemental Filing - 4-30-2020, 4. DOC - Comments - 5-11-2020, 5. OAG - Comments - 5-11-2020, 6. LPI - Comments - 5-11-2020, 7. CUB and EC - Comments - 5-11-2020, 8. CEO - Comments - 5-11-2020, 9. Walmart - Comments - 5-11-2020, 10. MFI - Letter - 5-14-2020, 11. IMA - Letter - 5-18-2020, 12. MP - Reply Comments - 5-18-2020, 13. OAG - Reply Comments - 5-18-2020, 14. LPI - Reply Comments - 5-18-2020, 15. OAG - Letter - 5-21-2020, 16. Briefing papers

title

**                     E015/GR-19-442;                     Minnesota Power                     

                     E015/M-20-429;

                     E015/M-16-564

In the Matter of the Application of Minnesota Power for Authority to Increase Electric Service Rates in Minnesota;

In the Matter of the Emergency Petition of Minnesota Power for Approval to Move Asset-Based Wholesale Sales Credits to the Fuel Adjustment Clause and Resolve Rate Case;

In the Matter of Minnesota Power’s Revised Petition for a Competitive Rate for Energy-Intensive Trade-Exposed (EITE) Customers and an EITE Cost Recovery Rider.

 

1.                     Should the Commission approve Minnesota Power's request to shift recovery of the Company's energy and capacity asset-based wholesale sales margins from base rates to its Fuel Adjustment Clause (FAC or FCA)?

2.                     Should the Commission approve Minnesota Power’s requested mid-year change to its currently approved 2020 FCA?

3.                     Should the Commission authorize Minnesota Power  to change base rates, as requested, as a result of this docket rather than in the  rate case?

4.                     Should the Commission approve Minnesota Power’s proposal to defer residential rate design issues in the rate case to the time-of-use residential rates docket (Docket No. E-015/M-12-233)?

5.                     Should the Commission approve Minnesota Power’s request to maintain the current EITE rider rate discount through February 1, 2021 or some other date? (PUC: Bonnett, Alonso, Bender, O’Grady)