Details 2015-039
| 2 | 1. | | TL - Transmission Line | * E015/TL-14-977 Minnesota Power
In the Matter of the Application of Minnesota Power for a Route Permit for the 16 Line Reroute Project in St. Louis County, Minnesota.
Should the Commission find that the environmental assessment and the record created at the public hearing adequately address the issues identified in the scoping decision? Should the Commission adopt the Administrative Law Judge Report? Should the Commission issue a route permit identifying a specific route and permit conditions for the 16 Line Reroute High Voltage Transmission Line Project? (PUC: Kaluzniak) | |
Action details
|
Details 08-1474
| 2 | 2. | | TL - Transmission Line | * E002,ET2/TL-08-1474 Great River Energy;
Xcel Energy
In the Matter of the Great River Energy Application for a Minor Alteration to the Helena - Chub Lake Substation Segment of the Brookings County - Hampton 345 kV Transmission Line Project in Scott County, Minnesota.
Should the Commission authorize the minor alteration request? If the minor alteration is approved, should any conditions be required? (PUC: Kaluzniak) | |
Action details
|
Details 2015-085
| 1 | 3. | | CN - Certificate of Need | *a ET2,E015/CN-14-853 Great River Energy;
Minnesota Power
In the Matter of the Joint Application of Great River Energy and Minnesota Power for a Certificate of Need and Route Permit for the Motley Area 115 KV Transmission Line Project in Morrison, Cass, and Todd Counties.
Should the Commission find that the Environmental Report/Assessment on this project is complete and addresses the Scoping Decision of the Department of Commerce? Should the Commission grant a Certificate of Need for the proposed 115 kV transmission line project? (PUC: DeBleeckere)
b ET2/E015/TL-15-204 Great River Energy;
Minnesota Power
In the Matter of the Joint Application of Great River Energy and Minnesota Power for a Route Permit for the Motley Area 115 kV Transmission Line Project in Morrison, Cass and Todd Counties.
Should the Commission find that the Environmental Assessment and the record on this project adequately address the issues identified in the Scoping Decision? Should the Commission issue a route permit identifying a specific route and permit conditions for the proposed 115 kV | |
Action details
|
Details 2015-084
| 1 | 4. | | AI - Affiliated Interest | E,G001/AI-15-102 Interstate Power and Light Company
Interstate Power and Light Company’s Petition for Approval of Amendment to Affiliated Interest Agreement. (PUC: Morrissey; DOC: Johnson) | |
Action details
|
Details 2014-314
| 3 | 5. | | PA - Property Acquisition | ** E001,115,140,105,139, Interstate Power and Light Company;
124,126,145,132,114, Southern Minnesota Electrical Coop
6521,142,135/PA-14- together (the “Joint Petitioners”)
322;
E001/PA-07-540
In the Matter of a Request for the Approval of the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement Between Interstate Power and Light Company and Southern Minnesota Energy Cooperative;
In the Matter of the Joint Petition for Approval of Transfer of Transmission Assets of Interstate Power and Light Company and ITC Midwest LLC.
Is the proposed sale consistent with the public interest?
Should the Commission request additional information?
Is a contested case proceeding necessary?
Should the Commission approve the proposed transaction?
If so, should approval be subject to conditions?
How should IPL return the remaining ATA to customers? (PUC: Kaml, Alonso, Dasinger, Twite) | |
Action details
|