|
Details 2016-136
| 1 | 1. | | S - Securities | * E017/S-16-367 Otter Tail Power Company
In the Matter of the Petition of Otter Tail Power Company for Approval of its 2016 Capital Structure and Permission to Issue Securities. (PUC: Kaml; DOC: Kundert) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2016-132
| 1 | 2. | | TL - Transmission Line | * ET6/TL-16-327 Minnkota Power Cooperative
In the Matter of the Application of Minnkota Power Cooperative, Inc. for a Route Permit for the MPL-Laporte 115 kV Transmission Line Project in Clearwater and Hubbard Counties, Minnesota.
Should the Commission reconsider its June 21, 2017 Order Issuing Route Permit? (PUC: Panait)
The Commission has the authority to accept or decline a petition for reconsideration with or without a hearing or oral argument (Minnesota Rules 7829.3000, Subpart 6). In other words, a decision on a petition for reconsideration can be made without taking oral comments at the Commission meeting. | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2015-262
| 3 | 3. | | TL - Transmission Line | ** ET2/TL-15-628 Great River Energy
In the Matter of the Application of Great River Energy for a Route Permit for the Bull Moose 115 kV Transmission Line Project in Cass County.
1. Should the Commission approve and adopt proposed findings of Fact and Conclusions for the Bull Moose 115 kV Transmission Line?
2. Should the Commission find that the environmental assessment and the record created at the public hearing adequately address the issues identified in the scoping decision?
3. Should the Commission issue a final route permit for the Bull Moose 115 kV Transmission Line Project? (PUC: Panait) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2015-274
| 3 | 4. | | TL - Transmission Line | ** ET2/TL-15-423 Great River Energy
In the Matter of the Application of Great River Energy for a Route Permit under the Alternative Permitting Process for the Palisade 115 kV Project near the city of Palisade, Minnesota.
· Should the Commission issue findings of fact and conclusions demonstrating that the alternative permitting process has been conducted in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 216E.04 and Minn. R. 7850.2800 to 7850.3900?
· Should the Commission find that the environmental assessment and the record created at the public hearing adequately address the issues identified in the scoping decision?
· Should the Commission grant a route permit for the Palisade 115 kV Transmission Line Project?
· Should the Commission require specific conditions if the route permit is granted? (PUC: Kaluzniak) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2016-138
| 1 | 5. | | WS - Wind Power Plant Siting | ** ET6657/WS-08-573 Wisconsin Power and Light Company
In the Matter of the Site Permit Issued to the Wisconsin Power and Light Company for the Bent Tree Project in Freeborn County.
What action should the Commission take in light of the Confidential Settlement Agreements filed on April 19, 2018? (PUC: DeBleeckere) | |
Action details
|