Details 2016-065
| 2 | 1. | | CN - Certificate of Need | * IP6961/CN-16-215 Blazing Star Wind Farm, LLC
In the Matter of the Application of Blazing Star Wind Farm, LLC for a Certificate of Need for the up to 200 Megawatt Blazing Star Wind Project in Lincoln County, Minnesota.
· Should the Commission find that the environmental report and the record created in this matter adequately address the issues identified in the environmental report scoping decision?
· Should the Commission grant a certificate of need for the up to 200 megawatt Blazing Star Wind Large Wind Energy Conversion System proposed in Lincoln County, Minnesota? (PUC: Ek) | |
Action details
|
Details 2015-325
| 2 | 2. | | GS - Power Plan Siting Non-wind | * E002/GS-15-834 Northern States Power Company
In the Matter of the Application of Northern States Power Company for a Site Permit for the 215 MW Black Dog Unit 6 Project in Burnsville, Minnesota.
Should the Commission approve the proposed findings of fact? Should the Commission find that the Environmental Assessment and the record on this project adequately address the issues identified in the Scoping Decision? Should the Commission issue a site permit for the proposed natural gas electric generating facility? (PUC: Panait) | |
Action details
|
Details 2016-151
| 1 | 3. | | SA - Service Area | * E119,143/SA-16-354 Todd-Wadena Electric Cooperative;
Lake Region Electric Cooperative
In the Matter of the Joint Request of Todd-Wadena Electric Cooperative and Lake Region Electric Cooperative for Approval of a Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Service Territory. (PUC: Twite; DOC: Lusti) | |
Action details
|
Details 2016-166
| 1 | 4. | | RV - Revocation Investigation | P3028/RV-16-453 Coast International, Inc.
In the Matter of the Revocation of Coast International, Inc.’s Certificate of Authority. (PUC: Fournier; DOC: Linscheid) | |
Action details
|
Details 2016-099
| 2 | 5. | | CI - Commission Initiated Investigation | ** P999/CI-16-302 All Local Service Providers
In the Matter of the Telephone Assistance Plan (TAP) Review.
1. Should the Commission issue any clarifications with respect to the TAP program as a result of the FCC Lifeline Modernization Order?
2. Should the Commission take any other action? (PUC: McCarthy) | |
Action details
|