|
Details 2016-194
| 1 | 1. | | SA - Service Area | E306,104/SA-16-647 Saint Peter Municipal Utilities;
BENCO Electric Cooperative
In the Matter of the Joint Request of Saint Peter Municipal Utilities and BENCO Electric Cooperative to Modify Electric Service Territory Boundaries. (PUC: Fournier; DOC: Lusti) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2013-414
| 14 | 2. | | CN - Certificate of Need | ** PL6668/CN-13-473; North Dakota Pipeline Company LLC
PL6668/PPL-13-474
In the Matter of the Application of North Dakota Pipeline Company LLC for a Certificate of Need for the Sandpiper Pipeline Project in Minnesota;
In the Matter of the Application of North Dakota Pipeline Company LLC for a Pipeline Routing Permit for the Sandpiper Pipeline Project in Minnesota.
Whether the Commission should consider imposing conditions on North Dakota Pipeline Company’s request to withdraw its certificate of need and route permit applications for its proposed Sandpiper Pipeline Project. (PUC: Ek) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2015-359
| 3 | 3. | | TL - Transmission Line | * ET6/TL-14-665 Minnkota Power Cooperative, Inc.
In the Matter of the Application of Minnkota Power Cooperative, Inc. for a Route Permit for the Clearbrook-Clearbrook West 115 kV Transmission Line Project in Clearwater County.
Whether the Commission should consider imposing conditions on Minnkota Power Cooperative’s request to withdraw its route permit application for its proposed Clearbrook-Clearbrook West 115 kV transmission line project. (PUC: DeBleeckere) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2016-132
| 2 | 4. | | TL - Transmission Line | * ET6/TL-16-327 Minnkota Power Cooperative
In the Matter of the Application of Minnkota Power Cooperative, Inc. for a Route Permit for the MPL-Laporte 115 kV Transmission Line Project in Clearwater and Hubbard Counties, Minnesota.
Should the Commission reconsider its June 21, 2017 Order Issuing Route Permit? (PUC: Panait)
The Commission has the authority to accept or decline a petition for reconsideration with or without a hearing or oral argument (Minnesota Rules 7829.3000, Subpart 6). In other words, a decision on a petition for reconsideration can be made without taking oral comments at the Commission meeting. | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2015-134
| 4 | 5. | | CN - Certificate of Need | ** PL9/CN-14-916; Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership
PL9/PPL-15-137;
PL9/C-20-801
In the Matter of the Application of Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership, for a Certificate of Need and Route Permit for the Proposed Line 3 Replacement Project in Minnesota from the North Dakota Border to the Wisconsin Border;
In the Matter of Honor the Earth’s October 27, 2020 Petition for Investigation and Complaint Concerning the Capacity of the Enbridge Mainline System.
Should the Commission reconsider its December 9, 2020 Order Denying Motion for Stay Pending Appeal? (PUC: Ek)
The Commission has the authority to accept or decline a petition for reconsideration with or without a hearing or oral argument (Minnesota Rules 7829.3000, Subpart 6) In other words, a decision on a petition for reconsideration can be made without taking oral comments at the Commission meeting. | |
Action details
|