Meeting Name: PUC Agenda Meeting Agenda status: Final
Meeting date/time: 3/23/2017 9:30 AM  
Meeting location: Large Hearing Room
Published agenda: Agenda Decisions Agenda Decisions Published minutes: Minutes Minutes  
Meeting video:  
Attachments:
File #Ver.Agenda #NameTypeTitleActionAction Details
Details 2017-47 11. M - MiscellaneousE002/M-17-46 Northern States Power Company d/b/a Xcel Energy In the Matter of Northern States Power Company d/b/a Xcel Energy’s Request for a Variance to the Billing Error Rules. (PUC: Rebholz; DOC: Kamara)  Not available
Details 2017-48 12. D - Depreciation* G004/D-16-466 Great Plains Natural Gas Co. In the Matter of Great Plains Natural Gas Co.’s Annual Depreciation Study. (PUC: Schwieger; DOC: Byrne)  Not available
Details 2017-49 13. PA - Property Acquisition* E001/PA-07-540; Interstate Power and Light Company E001/GR-10-276; E001/PA-14-322 In the Matter of Interstate Power and Light Company’s Annual Refund Report of Alternative Transaction Adjustment Amounts. (PUC: Kaml; DOC: Johnson)  Not available
Details 2017-50 14. M - Miscellaneous* G6915/M-16-756 Dooley’s Natural Gas II, LLC In the Matter of a Petition by Dooley’s Natural Gas II, LLC for a Small Gas Utility Franchise Exemption. Does Dooley’s Natural Gas II, LLC meet the statutory requirements for a small gas utility franchise exemption under Minn. Stat. § 216B.16, Subd. 12? (PUC: Bonnett, Brill)  Not available
Details 2017-24 15. M - Miscellaneous** G011/M-15-895; Minnesota Energy Resources Corporation G011/M-16-315 In the Matter of a Petition by Minnesota Energy Resources Corporation (MERC) for Project Evaluation and Approval of Rider Recovery for its Rochester Natural Gas Extension Project; In the Matter of a Petition by Minnesota Energy Resources Corporation (MERC) for Project Evaluation and Approval of Rider Recovery for its Rochester Natural Gas Extension Project (Highly Sensitive Trade Secret). Should the Commission approve Minnesota Energy Resources Corporation's (MERC's) request for advance approval of its Rochester Natural Gas Extension Project (NGEP)? If so, should the Commission approve Minnesota Energy Resources Corporation's (MERC's) request for a Natural Gas Extension Project (NGEP) Costs Rider for the Rochester Project? Should the Commission also approve MERC's proposal for recovery of Rochester project costs through MERC's base rates and its purchased gas adjustment (PGA) mechanism? (PUC: Brill, Bender, Schwieger)  Not available
Details 2015-334 46. GP - Natural Gas Pipeline* G011/GP-15-858 Minnesota Energy Resources Corporation In the Matter of the Application of Minnesota Energy Resources Corporation for a Route Permit for the Rochester Natural Gas Pipeline Project in Olmsted County. Should the Commission issue a pipeline route permit for the approximately 13-mile, up to16-inch outside diameter natural gas pipeline and associated facilities along the west and south sides of the City of Rochester, Minnesota? (PUC: Kaluzniak)  Not available