|
Details 2017-143
| 1 | 1. | | M - Miscellaneous | * E111/M-17-180 Dakota Electric Association
In the Matter of the Petition by Dakota Electric Association for Approval to Implement a Contract Rate Service. (PUC: Krishnan; DOC: Rakow) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2017-144
| 1 | 2. | | M - Miscellaneous | ** G011/M-17-210; Minnesota Energy Resources Corporation
G011/M-17-211;
G011/M-17-212
In the Matter of the Petition of Minnesota Energy Resources Corporation for Approval to Add Additional Customer Classes to the Detroit Lakes-Long Lake New Area Surcharge Project;
In the Matter of the Petition of Minnesota Energy Resources Corporation for Approval to Add Additional Customer Classes to the Ely Lake New Area Surcharge Project;
In the Matter of the Petition of Minnesota Energy Resources Corporation for Approval to Add Additional Customer Classes to the Fayal Township Long Lake New Area Surcharge Project.
Should the Commission approve MERC's request to add additional New Area Surcharge (NAS) surcharges for the Large Commercial and Industrial (C&I), Small Volume Interruptible (SVI), and Large Volume Interruptible (LVI) customer classes to previously approved NAS projects?
Should the Commission require MERC to recalculate the previously approved Residential and Small C&I NAS surcharges from Docket Nos. 15-441, 15-776, and 16-221 to reflect the unanticipated customer class growth?
Should | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2017-134
| 1 | 3. | | M - Miscellaneous | ** G002/M-17-174 Northern States Power Company d/b/a Xcel Energy
In the Matter of the Petition of Northern States Power Company for Approval of a Modification to Its Natural Gas State Energy Policy (SEP) Tariff, 2017 SEP Rate Factor, and 2016 SEP Compliance Filing.
Should the Commission require Xcel Gas to discontinue its SEP rider?
Should the Commission allow Xcel Gas to continue to recover assessment costs for Department Regional & National Duties under Minn. Stat. § 216B.62, Subd. 3b? And, if so, how should those costs be recovered?
Should the Commission allow Xcel Gas to continue to recover costs previously incurred for its Cast Iron Replacement Project which were authorized under Minn. Stat. § 216B.1637, Recovery of Certain Greenhouse Gas Infrastructure Costs, when the statute was repealed by the Legislature in 2013? And, if so, how should those costs be recovered? (PUC: Schwieger) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2015-134
| 8 | 4. | | CN - Certificate of Need | ** PL9/CN-14-916; Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership
PL9/PPL-15-137;
PL9/C-20-801
In the Matter of the Application of Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership, for a Certificate of Need and Route Permit for the Proposed Line 3 Replacement Project in Minnesota from the North Dakota Border to the Wisconsin Border;
In the Matter of Honor the Earth’s October 27, 2020 Petition for Investigation and Complaint Concerning the Capacity of the Enbridge Mainline System.
Should the Commission reconsider its December 9, 2020 Order Denying Motion for Stay Pending Appeal? (PUC: Ek)
The Commission has the authority to accept or decline a petition for reconsideration with or without a hearing or oral argument (Minnesota Rules 7829.3000, Subpart 6) In other words, a decision on a petition for reconsideration can be made without taking oral comments at the Commission meeting. | |
Action details
|