|
Details 2017-174
| 1 | 1. | | GR - General Rate | ** G008/GR-17-285 CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp., d/b/a
CenterPoint Energy Minnesota Gas
In the Matter of the Application by CenterPoint Energy for Authority to Increase Natural Gas Rates in Minnesota.
1. Should the Commission accept CenterPoint Energy’s revised annual Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan Report for 2019?
2. Should the Commission require a refund to ratepayers, and, if so, should the Commission require a refund of $52,994 or $147,212, plus interest?
3. Should the Commission allow CenterPoint Energy to combine any incentive compensation refund required with its interim rate refund in docket G-008/GR-19-524? (PUC: Bender) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2017-176
| 1 | 2. | | MR - Fuel Clause Adjustment /Refund | * G008/MR-17-591 CenterPoint Energy Resources Corporation d/b/a
CenterPoint Energy Minnesota Gas
In the Matter of CenterPoint Energy Resources Corporation’s Filing to Establish a New Base Gas Cost Filing (PGA Zero-Out) for Interim Rates in CenterPoint Energy’s General Rate Filing, Docket No. G008/GR-17-285.
Should the Commission approve the proposed new base cost of gas? (PUC: Alonso, Bonnett) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2013-332
| 13 | 3. | | CI - Commission Initiated Investigation | * E,G999/CI-12-1344 Rate-Regulated Energy Utilities
In the Matter of a Commission Inquiry into the Privacy Policies of Rate-Regulated Energy Utilities.
1. Should the Commission approve the Consent Form proposed by Great Plains Natural Gas Company?
2. Should the Commission approve the Consent Form proposed by Minnesota Energy Resources Corporation?
3. Should the Commission approve the Consent Form proposed by CenterPoint Energy?
4. Should the Commission modify its Consent Form approval process? (PUC: O’Grady) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2017-177
| 1 | 4. | | RP - Resource Planning | ** E015/RP-15-690; Minnesota Power
E015/AI-17-568
In the Matter of Minnesota Power’s 2015-2029 Integrated Resource Plan;
In the Matter of Minnesota Power’s Petition for Approval of the EnergyForward Resource Package.
Should the Commission grant Minnesota Power’s request for an extension to file its next integrated resource plan?
Is Minnesota Power’s proposed procedural process reasonable? (PUC: Stalpes) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2017-173
| 1 | 5. | | M - Miscellaneous | ** E015/M-16-564; Minnesota Power
E015/GR-16-664
In the Matter of Minnesota Power’s Revised Petition for a Competitive Rate for Energy-Intensive Trade-Exposed (EITE) Customers and an EITE Cost Recovery Rider;
In the Matter of the Application of Minnesota Power for Authority to Increase Rates for Electric Service in Minnesota.
1. Should the Commission reconsider or reopen its Cost Recovery Orders?
2. If so, should the Cost Recovery Orders be modified? (PUC: O’Grady)
The commission shall decide a petition for rehearing, amendment, vacation, reconsideration, or reargument with or without a hearing or oral argument. The commission may vacate or stay the order, or part of the order, that is the subject of the petition, pending action on the petition. [Minn. Rules 7829.3000, subp. 6] | |
Action details
|