Meeting Name: PUC Agenda Meeting Agenda status: Final
Meeting date/time: 9/21/2017 9:30 AM  
Meeting location: Large Hearing Room
Published agenda: Agenda Decisions Agenda Decisions Published minutes: Minutes Minutes  
Meeting video:  
Attachments:
File #Ver.Agenda #NameTypeTitleActionAction Details
Details 2017-187 11. PR - Periodic Reports* P999/PR-17-8 Local Exchange Companies; Eligible Telecommunications Carriers In the Matter of Annual Certifications Related to Eligible Telecommunications Carriers' (ETCs) Use of the Federal Universal Service Support Required Pursuant to C.F.R. §54.313. Should the Commission approve all petitioning ETCs' requests for high cost support certification? (PUC: McCarthy; DOC: Gullikson)  Action details
Details 2015-329 32. GR - General RateE002/GR-15-826 Northern States Power Company d/b/a Xcel Energy In the Matter of the Application of Northern States Power Company for Authority to Increase Rates for Electric Service in the State of Minnesota. Should Xcel’s request to discontinue making compliance filings related to the Cold Weather Rule in this docket? (PUC: Alonso; DOC: Kundert)  Action details
Details 2014-031 143. M - Miscellaneous** E002/M-13-867 Northern States Power Company d/b/a Xcel Energy In the Matter of the Petition of Xcel Energy for Approval of its Proposed Community Solar Garden Program. Should the Commission approve Xcel Energy’s proposal to move all Applicable Retail Rate-era community solar gardens to the 2017 Value-of-Solar Rate, as found in the Company’s September 25, 2023 compliance filing? (PUC: Strauss)  Action details
Details 2016-131 44. M - Miscellaneous** E002/M-13-867 Northern States Power Company d/b/a Xcel Energy In the Matter of the Petition of Xcel Energy For Approval of its Proposed Community Solar Garden Program. 1. Should the Commission approve the 2024 VOS? 2. Should the Commission eliminate the annual filing requirement for the VOS? (PUC: Strauss)  Action details
Details 2015-349 25. CI - Commission Initiated Investigation** E999/CI-15-755 All Electric Utilities In the Matter of a Commission Inquiry into Fees Charged on Qualifying Facilities. Is it permissible under Minnesota statutes and rules to impose an additional monthly fee on a qualifying facility interconnected with a public utility? If an additional fee is permissible, what factors should the Commission consider in determining whether the fee or charge is reasonable? Should the Commission take any action on the specific fees charged by Minnesota Power, Otter Tail Power, and Xcel Energy? (PUC: Terwilliger, Rosier)  Action details