|
Details 2017-217
| 1 | 1. | | M - Miscellaneous | * P6978/M-17-213 Assist Wireless, Inc.
In the Matter of Assist Wireless’s Petition for ETC Designation in Minnesota.
1. Whether Assist Wireless, Inc. has the intent and capability to offer and advertise voice telephony service to Lifeline-qualified customers throughout its requested service area.
2. Whether designation of Assist Wireless, Inc. as an ETC, limited to the provision of Lifeline service, is in the public interest. (PUC: McCarthy) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2015-068
| 5 | 2. | | GS - Power Plan Siting Non-wind | * IP6941/GS-14-1052 Marshall Solar, LLC
In the Matter of the Marshall Solar, LLC Site Permit for the Marshall Solar Energy Project and Associated Facilities in Lyons County.
Should the Commission approve the request for a minor alteration to authorize the construction of a shed within the project area? (PUC: DeBleeckere; DOC: Steinhauer) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2017-215
| 1 | 3. | | M - Miscellaneous | * E002/M-17-531 Northern States Power Company dba Xcel Energy
In the Matter of Petition of Approval to Terminate the Pine Bend Power Purchase Agreement (PPA).
What action should the Commission take on the Petition to Terminate the Pine Bend PPA? (Martone, Stalpes) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2017-218
| 1 | 4. | | M - Miscellaneous | ** G011/M-17-409 Minnesota Energy Resources Corporation
In the Matter of a Petition by the Minnesota Energy Resources Corporation (MERC) for Approval of Farm Tap Customer-Owned Fuel Line Replacement Plan, Tariff Amendments, and Deferred Accounting.
1. Should the Commission accept MERC's Phase I report and permit continued deferred accounting of the costs incurred through the evaluation and implementation of Phase II?
2. Has MERC provided the information required in the Commission's November 30, 2017 Order?
3. Should the Commission determine that the costs incurred in Phase I and Phase II of the farm tap project satisfy the definition of gas utility infrastructure costs, and therefore, are eligible for recovery in a future GUIC Rider filing?
4. Should the Commission authorize MERC to move forward with implementation of its revised Phase II farm tap replacement project and approve the proposed schedule for the implementation of Phase II? (PUC: Bonnett, McShane) | |
Action details
|