|
Details 2017-100
| 3 | 1. | | WS - Wind Power Plant Siting | * IP6979/WS-17-265 Palmer’s Creek Wind Farm, LLC
In the Matter of the Application of Palmer’s Creek Wind Farm, LLC for a Site Permit for the 44.6 Megawatt (MW) Palmer’s Creek Wind Project in Chippewa County, Minnesota.
1. Should the Commission adopt the administrative law judge’s Summary of Public Testimony, Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendation?
2. Should the Commission grant a site permit for the 44.6 MW Palmer’s Creek Wind Large Energy Conversion System proposed in Chippewa County? (PUC: Panait) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2018-082
| 1 | 2. | | PA - Property Acquisition | * E017/PA-18-40 Otter Tail Power Company
In the Matter of a Petition of Otter Tail Power Company for Approval of Transfer of Property. (PUC: Bonnett; DOC: Amevo) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2017-174
| 2 | 3. | | GR - General Rate | ** G008/GR-17-285 CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp., d/b/a
CenterPoint Energy Minnesota Gas
In the Matter of the Application by CenterPoint Energy for Authority to Increase Natural Gas Rates in Minnesota.
1. Should the Commission accept CenterPoint Energy’s revised annual Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan Report for 2019?
2. Should the Commission require a refund to ratepayers, and, if so, should the Commission require a refund of $52,994 or $147,212, plus interest?
3. Should the Commission allow CenterPoint Energy to combine any incentive compensation refund required with its interim rate refund in docket G-008/GR-19-524? (PUC: Bender) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2017-268
| 2 | 4. | | SA - Service Area | ** E015,106/SA-17-893 Lake Country Power;
Minnesota Power
In the Matter of the Complaint by Lake Country Power Against Minnesota Power Alleging Violation of Its Exclusive Service Area By Providing Service to Canadian National Railway Company Facilities Near Hoyt Lakes, Minnesota.
What procedure should the Commission use to decide this matter? (PUC: Fournier) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2018-081
| 1 | 5. | | AI - Affiliated Interest | ** E002/AI-17-577 Northern States Power Company,
doing business as Xcel Energy
In the Matter of Xcel Energy’s Petition for Approval of an Affiliated Interest Agreement.
Should the Commission approve the use of the two tariffed contracts, the S*RC Standard Contract and the Interconnection Agreement, between Xcel Energy and its non-regulated affiliate Nicollet Projects I LLC (Nicollet Projects) in order to allow participation by Nicollet Projects in Xcel’s S*RC program?
Should the Commission approve the Administrative Services Agreement (ASA) between Xcel Energy Services (XES) and Nicollet Projects? (PUC: Mackenzie) | |
Action details
|