|
Details 2018-186
| 1 | 1. | | SA - Service Area | E229,147/SA-18-493 Detroit Lakes Public Utilities;
Wild Rice Electric Cooperative
In the Matter of the Joint Request of Detroit Lakes Public Utilities and Wild Rice Electric Cooperative for Approval of a Service Territory Transfer Agreement Between the Two Utilities. (PUC: Terwilliger; DOC: Lusti) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2018-180
| 1 | 2. | | M - Miscellaneous | ** E017/S-18-313 Otter Tail Power Company
In the Matter of the Petition of Otter Tail Power Company (OTP) for Approval of 2018 Capital Structure and Permission to Issue Securities
1. Should the Commission approve OTP’s 2018 capital structure and grant permission to issue securities?
2. Should the Commission require OTP to provide additional information in all future capital structure filings? (PUC: Krishnan) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2018-181
| 1 | 3. | | M - Miscellaneous | * E017/M-18-380 Otter Tail Power Company
In the Matter of Otter Tail Power Company’s Petition for Approval of Tariff Changes to Facilitate Implementation of A New Customer Information System.
What action should the Commission take on the recommendation to cease periodic reports that track inquiries related to the company’s CIS implementation? (PUC: Martone) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2018-183
| 1 | 4. | | M - Miscellaneous | * PL6580/M-06-1063; Greater Minnesota Transmission, LLC;
PL6580/M-13-91;
PL6580/M-13-94;
PL6580/M-14-386;
G022/M-14-342;
PL6580/M-14-578;
PL6580/M-14-1056;
PL6580/M-15-967;
PL6580/M-15-968;
PL6580/M-15-1041;
PL6580/M-16-936;
PL6580/M-16-1026
GMT’s Annual Load Factor Utilization Report, by Pipeline Segment.
1. Should the Commission accept Greater Minnesota Transmission’s January 12, 2018 annual load factor utilization report as compliant with Commission Orders?
2. Should the Commission require additional analysis on Greater Minnesota Gas’ high utilization of Greater Minnesota Transmission overrun capacity service?
3. Should the Commission require Greater Minnesota Gas to demonstrate that it holds sufficient Northern Natural Gas and Greater Minnesota Transmission mainline and lateral capacity to serve its retail firm sales customers located on these pipeline segments? (PUC: Brill, Bonnett, Bartusch) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2018-188
| 1 | 5. | | M - Miscellaneous | * G6956/M-15-856; Community Co-ops of Lake Park;
G6960/M-16-214; United Natural Gas, LLC;
G6977/M-17-186; Lake Region Energy Services;
G6915/M-13-672; Dooley’s Natural Gas I, LLC;
G6915/M-16-756 Dooley’s Natural Gas II, LLC
In the Matter of Community Co-ops of Lake Park’s Petition for an Exemption for a Small Gas Utility Franchise;
In the Matter of a Petition by United Natural Gas, LLC for approval of its Request for a Small Gas Utility Franchise Exemption;
In the Matter of a Petition by Lake Region Energy Services, Inc. for a Small Gas Utility Franchise Exemption;
In the Matter of the Petition of Dooley’s Natural Gas LLC for Exemption for a Small Gas Utility;
In the Matter of a Petition by Dooley’s Natural Gas II, LLC for a Small Gas Utility Franchise Exemption.
1. Should the Commission approve the annual compliance filings from LRES, Dooley’s I and Dooley’s II?
2. What information should the Commission require in future annual compliance filings from those companies who are exempt small gas utilities? (PUC: Brill, Bonnett, Bartusch) | |
Action details
|