Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Bookmark and Share
Meeting Name: PUC Agenda Meeting Agenda status: Final
Meeting date/time: 9/27/2018 10:00 AM  
Meeting location: Rochester, MN
Published agenda: Agenda Decisions Agenda Decisions Published minutes: Minutes Minutes  
Meeting video:  
Attachments:
File #Ver.Agenda #NameTypeTitleActionAction Details
Details 2018-200 11. PR - Periodic ReportsP999/PR-18-20 All Telecommunications Carriers In the Matter of 2017 Lifeline Recertification Results. (PUC: McCarthy; DOC: Linscheid)  Not available
Details 2018-199 12. PR - Periodic Reports* P999/PR-18-8 Local Exchange Companies; Eligible Telecommunications Carriers In the Matter of Annual Certifications Related to Eligible Telecommunications Carriers' (ETCs) Use of the Federal Universal Service Support Required Pursuant to C.F.R. §54.313. 1. Should the Commission approve all petitioning ETCs' requests for high cost support certification? 2. Should the Commission order other action in this matter? (PUC: McCarthy)  Not available
Details 2018-198 13. RP - Resource Planning* ET9/RP-17-753 Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency (SMMPA) In the Matter of Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency’s Submittal of Its 2018-2032 Integrated Resource Plan. What action should the Commission take on SMMPA’s filing? (PUC: Bahn)  Not available
Details 2018-193 14. M - Miscellaneous** IP6981/CN-17-306; Dodge County Wind, LLC IP6981/WS-17-307; IP6981/TL-17-308 In the Matter of the Application of Dodge County Wind, LLC for a Certificate of Need for the Dodge County Wind Project and Associated Facilities in Dodge, Steele, and Olmsted Counties, Minnesota; In the Matter of the Application of Dodge County Wind, LLC for a Site Permit for the Dodge County Wind Project and Associated Facilities in Dodge and Steele Counties, Minnesota; In the Matter of the Application of Dodge County Wind, LLC for a Route Permit for the 345 kV High-Voltage Transmission Line Associated with the Dodge County Wind Project in Dodge and Olmsted Counties, Minnesota. 1. Should the Commission accept the combined large wind energy conversion system (LWECS) and high-voltage transmission line (HVTL) certificate of need application as substantially complete? 2. Should the Commission accept the LWECS site permit application as substantially complete? 3. Should the Commission accept the HVTL route permit as substantially complete? 4. Should the Commission direct that the combined LWECS and HVTL cer  Not available