|
Details 2019-039
| 1 | 1. | | PPL - Petroleum Pipeline | ** PL9/PPL-18-752 Enbridge Energy, LLC
In the Matter of the Application of Enbridge Energy for a Route Permit and Partial Exemption for the Fond du Lac Line 4 Project in Saint Louis and Carlton Counties.
Should the Commission grant a partial exemption from the pipeline route selection procedures and issue a pipeline route permit for a 10 mile segment of the Line 4 Pipeline on the Fond du Lac Reservation in Saint Louis and Carlton Counties? (PUC: Kaluzniak) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2018-216
| 2 | 2. | | AI - Affiliated Interest | ** E015/AI-17-568 Minnesota Power (MP)
In the Matter of Minnesota Power’s Petition for Approval of the EnergyForward Resource Package.
Should the Commission reconsider its January 24, 2019 Order Approving Affiliate Interest Agreements with Conditions? (PUC: Stalpes, Kaluzniak)
The Commission has the authority to accept or decline a petition for reconsideration with or without a hearing or oral argument (Minnesota Rules 7829.3000, Subpart 6) In other words, a decision on a petition for reconsideration can be made without taking oral comments at the Commission meeting. | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2019-043
| 1 | 3. | | M - Miscellaneous | ** E002/M-18-714 Northern States Power Company d/b/a Xcel Energy
A. In the Matter of Tariff Revisions to Implement Updated DER Interconnection Process and Standard Interconnection Agreement in E999/CI-16-521.
1. Should the Commission approve or modify Xcel Energy’s proposed tariff revisions to implement the updated interconnection standards (MN DIP/DIA)? (PUC: Rosier)
** E002/M-13-1015; Northern States Power Company d/b/a Xcel Energy
E002/M-16-222
B. In the Matter of Xcel Energy’s Petition for Approval of Updates to Solar*Rewards and Community Solar Garden Program Tariffs and Tariff Modification Implementing Cogeneration and Small Power Production.
1. Should the Commission approve or approve with modification Xcel Energy’s proposed tariff revisions to the Solar*Rewards Program and Solar*Rewards Community tariffs?
2. Should the Commission approve a 30-day negative check-off process for approved amendments to the third-generation Solar*Rewards Contract and Solar*Rewards Contract for those receiving Solar*Rewards Incentive? (PUC: Rosier)
** E002/M-13-867 Northern States | |
Action details
|