|
Details 2020-079
| 1 | 1. | | WS - Wind Power Plant Siting | * IP6557/WS-06-91 FPL Energy Mower County Wind, LLC
In the Matter of the Site Permit Amendment to Repower the 98.9 Megawatt Mower County Wind Energy Center Project and Associated Facilities in Mower County, Minnesota.
Should the Commission approve the request to amend the Mower County Wind, LLC Site Permit? (PUC: Panait) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2020-081
| 1 | 2. | | M - Miscellaneous | * E002/M-20-437; Northern States Power Company d/b/a Xcel Energy
E002/AA-19-293
In the Matter of Northern States Power Company’s Proposal to Adjust the 2020 Fuel Forecast Monthly Fuel Cost Charges.
Should the Commission approve Xcel’s request to lower FCA rates during the months of June, July and August 2020? (PUC: Alonso, Bender, Bonnett) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2020-043
| 1 | 3. | | D - Depreciation | PULLED
** E017/D-19-547 Otter Tail Power Company
In the Matter of Otter Tail Power Company’s Petition for Approval of its 2019 Annual Review of Depreciation Certification.
1. Should the Commission approve the proposed depreciation parameters and the resulting rates for Otter Tail Power Company’s annual depreciation update?
2. Should the proposed remaining lives of Hoot Lake Production Plant Units 2 & 3 and Hydraulic Production Plant be reduced by one year to better match depreciation accruals to plant retirement? (PUC: Hetherington) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2020-080
| 1 | 4. | | GR - General Rate | ** E015/GR-19-442; Minnesota Power
E015/M-20-429;
E015/M-16-564
In the Matter of the Application of Minnesota Power for Authority to Increase Electric Service Rates in Minnesota;
In the Matter of the Emergency Petition of Minnesota Power for Approval to Move Asset-Based Wholesale Sales Credits to the Fuel Adjustment Clause and Resolve Rate Case;
In the Matter of Minnesota Power’s Revised Petition for a Competitive Rate for Energy-Intensive Trade-Exposed (EITE) Customers and an EITE Cost Recovery Rider.
1. Should the Commission approve Minnesota Power's request to shift recovery of the Company's energy and capacity asset-based wholesale sales margins from base rates to its Fuel Adjustment Clause (FAC or FCA)?
2. Should the Commission approve Minnesota Power’s requested mid-year change to its currently approved 2020 FCA?
3. Should the Commission authorize Minnesota Power to change base rates, as requested, as a result of this docket rather than in the rate case?
4. Should the Commission approve Minnesota Power’s proposal to defer residential rate design issues in the r | |
Action details
|