File #: Details 2025-077    Version: 1 Name:
Type: M - Miscellaneous Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 4/30/2025 In control: PUC Agenda Meeting
On agenda: 5/22/2025 Final action:
Title: ** E002/M-24-432 Northern States Power Co. d/b/a Xcel Energy In the Matter of a Peak Time Rebate Program for Xcel Energy to Further the Commission's Advanced Rate Design Efforts in Docket No. E002/CI-24-115. 1. What process should the Commission use to review Xcel's Peak Time Rebate (PTR) proposal and its proposal to seek cost recovery through its Energy Conservation and Optimization (ECO) portfolio? 2. Is inclusion in Xcel's ECO portfolio the appropriate regulatory pathway for determining program design, terms and conditions, cost recovery, and reporting for the PTR program? 3. Do any aspects of the proposed PTR program require Commission approval, such as a customer service agreement, standard terms and conditions, or other program components that would be included in the utility's tariff? 4. If Commission review of the proposal, or specific elements of the proposal, is appropriate or required, what process should the Commission use to complete its evaluation? (PUC: Ricker)
Attachments: 1. Xcel Initial Petition 4-17-25, 2. DOC Comments 4-16-25, 3. OAG Comments 4-16-25, 4. Xcel Comments 4-16-25, 5. Briefing Papers
Date Ver.Action ByActionAction DetailsMeeting Details
No records to display.

title

**                     E002/M-24-432                     Northern States Power Co. d/b/a Xcel Energy

In the Matter of a Peak Time Rebate Program for Xcel Energy to Further the Commission’s Advanced Rate Design Efforts in Docket No. E002/CI-24-115.

 

1.                     What process should the Commission use to review Xcel’s Peak Time Rebate (PTR) proposal and its proposal to seek cost recovery through its Energy Conservation and Optimization (ECO) portfolio?

2.                     Is inclusion in Xcel’s ECO portfolio the appropriate regulatory pathway for determining program design, terms and conditions, cost recovery, and reporting for the PTR program?

3.                     Do any aspects of the proposed PTR program require Commission approval, such as a customer service agreement, standard terms and conditions, or other program components that would be included in the utility’s tariff?

4.                     If Commission review of the proposal, or specific elements of the proposal, is appropriate or required, what process should the Commission use to complete its evaluation? (PUC: Ricker)