File #: Details 2016-071    Version: Name:
Type: M - Miscellaneous Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 4/20/2016 In control: PUC Agenda Meeting
On agenda: 10/26/2017 Final action:
Title: ** G6960/M-16-214 United Natural Gas, LLC In the Matter of a Petition by United Natural Gas LLC (UNG) for approval of its Request for a Small Gas Utility Franchise Exemption. Does the Lower Sioux's status as a sovereign nation mean that UNG's provision of natural gas service to the Lower Sioux is not subject to Commission jurisdiction and regulation? Should the Commission approve UNG's request to extend its current Lafayette/Courtland, MN small gas utility franchise exemption from Commission regulation, to include incidental service along the GMT intrastate pipeline route approved in Docket No. 16-1026? (PUC: Brill, Bonnett)
Attachments: 1. UNG Letter Req Exemption for Lower Sioux part 1 of 3 2-7-17, 2. UNG Letter Req Exemption for Lower Sioux part 2 of 3 2-7-17, 3. UNG Letter Req Exemption for Lower Sioux part 3 of 3 2-7-17, 4. DOC Request for Comment Period 4-7-17, 5. UNG Response to DOC req for Comment Period 4-17-17, 6. UNG Response to DOC req for Comment Period attachment 4-17-17, 7. PUC Order to Open Comment Period 5-23-17, 8. PUC Order 5-24-16, 9. PUC Notice of Comment Period 6-21-17, 10. UNG Reply comments 7-21-17, 11. Lower Sioux Comments 8-21-17, 12. DOC Reply Comments 8-22-17, 13. Briefing Papers

title

**                     G6960/M-16-214                     United Natural Gas, LLC

In the Matter of a Petition by United Natural Gas LLC (UNG) for approval of its Request for a Small Gas Utility Franchise Exemption.

 

Does the Lower Sioux's status as a sovereign nation mean that UNG's provision of natural gas service to the Lower Sioux is not subject to Commission jurisdiction and regulation?

Should the Commission approve UNG's request to extend its current Lafayette/Courtland, MN small gas utility franchise exemption from Commission regulation, to include incidental service along the GMT intrastate pipeline route approved in Docket No. 16-1026? (PUC: Brill, Bonnett)