File #: Details 2024-189    Version: 1 Name:
Type: GR - General Rate Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 11/12/2024 In control: PUC Agenda Meeting
On agenda: 10/9/2025 Final action:
Title: *** G022/GR-24-350 Greater Minnesota Gas, Inc. G022/MR-24-351 In the Matter of the Application of Greater Minnesota Gas, Inc. for Authority to Increase Rates for Natural Gas Utility Service in Minnesota; In the Matter of Greater Minnesota Gas, Inc.'s Petition for Approval of a New Base Cost of Gas. Should the Commission adopt all of the recommendations in the ALJ Report? If not, what level of revenue is appropriate for the Company during the test year? How should that revenue be collected from its customers? (PUC: Bonnett, Andringa, Larson, Mohammed, Pham, Willette)
Attachments: 1. GMG DOC OAG Resolved Issues List 4-17-25, 2. GMG Initial Brief 5-8-25, 3. GMG Initial Brief Att 1 5-8-25, 4. GMG Initial Brief Att 2 5-8-25, 5. GMG Initial Brief Att 3 5-8-25, 6. DOC Initial Brief 5-8-25, 7. OAG Initial Brief 5-8-25, 8. GMG Reply Brief 5-22-25, 9. DOC Reply Brief 5-22-25, 10. OAG Reply Brief 5-22-25, 11. GMG Proposed Findings of Fact 5-22-25, 12. DOC Proposed Findings of Fact 5-22-25, 13. OAG Proposed Findings of Fact 8-22-25, 14. ALJ Findings of Fact, etc. 7-11-25, 15. GMG Exceptions 7-31-25, 16. DOC Exceptions 7-31-25, 17. OAG Exceptions 7-31-25, 18. FINAL Volume I - Financial Issues Briefing Papers 24-350, 19. FINAL Volume II - Sales Forecast Briefing Papers GMG 24-350, 20. FINAL Volume III - Cost of Capital Briefing Papers 24-350, 21. FINAL Volume IV - Class Cost of Service Briefing Papers 24-350, 22. FINAL Volume V - Rate Design Briefing Papers 24-350, 23. Deliberation Outline, 24. Decision Options - Tuma - Greater Minnesota Gas Rate Case - 10.09.25
Date Ver.Action ByActionAction DetailsMeeting Details
No records to display.

title

***                     G022/GR-24-350                     Greater Minnesota Gas, Inc.

                     G022/MR-24-351

In the Matter of the Application of Greater Minnesota Gas, Inc. for Authority to Increase Rates for Natural Gas Utility Service in Minnesota;

In the Matter of Greater Minnesota Gas, Inc.’s Petition for Approval of a New Base Cost of Gas.

 

Should the Commission adopt all of the recommendations in the ALJ Report?  If not, what level of revenue is appropriate for the Company during the test year?  How should that revenue be collected from its customers? (PUC: Bonnett, Andringa, Larson, Mohammed, Pham, Willette)