File #: Details 2025-117    Version: 1 Name:
Type: M - Miscellaneous Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 6/12/2025 In control: PUC Agenda Meeting
On agenda: 7/1/2025 Final action:
Title: E999/M-25-99 Minnesota Transmission Owners *5A. In the Matter of the 2025 Biennial Transmission Projects Report. 1. Should the Commission approve the Department's request for additional Funding under Minnesota Statute 216B.62, Subd. 8? (PUC: Eknes) **5B. In the Matter of the 2025 Biennial Transmission Projects Report. 1. What methodology should the Commission direct affected transmission owners to use in calculating the payback period of grid enhancing technologies (GETs) as directed by Minnesota Session Laws, 2024, Chapter 127, Article 42, Section 52? 2. What payback period value should the Commission set as the threshold at which a GETs project must be included in the implementation plan portion of a transmission owner's GETs Report? 3. Should the Commission request or require transmission owners to evaluate the cost effectiveness or payback periods of GETs projects addressing locations likely to experience high levels of congestion during the next five years (Subd. 2, clause 3)...
Attachments: 1. DOC Letter 6-6-25, 2. MTO Comments 4-11-25, 3. DOC Comments 4-11-25, 4. EDF Comments 4-11-25, 5. WATT Comments 4-11-25, 6. MTO Reply Comments 5-9-25, 7. WATT Reply Comments 5-9-25, 8. Briefing Papers-5A, 9. Briefing Papers-5B, 10. Briefing Papers_Attachment 1 - 5B, 11. DOC Revised Decision Options_GETs 6-27-25, 12. 25-99 GETs Payback Period Ham DOs
Date Ver.Action ByActionAction DetailsMeeting Details
No records to display.

title

                     E999/M-25-99                     Minnesota Transmission Owners

 *5A. In the Matter of the 2025 Biennial Transmission Projects Report.

 

1.                     Should the Commission approve the Department’s request for additional Funding under Minnesota Statute 216B.62, Subd. 8? (PUC: Eknes)

 

**5B. In the Matter of the 2025 Biennial Transmission Projects Report.

 

1.                     What methodology should the Commission direct affected transmission owners to use in calculating the payback period of grid enhancing technologies (GETs) as directed by Minnesota Session Laws, 2024, Chapter 127, Article 42, Section 52?

2.                     What payback period value should the Commission set as the threshold at which a GETs project must be included in the implementation plan portion of a transmission owner’s GETs Report?

3.                     Should the Commission request or require transmission owners to evaluate the cost effectiveness or payback periods of GETs projects addressing locations likely to experience high levels of congestion during the next five years (Subd. 2, clause 3), in addition to those with existing congestion (Subd. 2, clause 1)? (PUC: Ricker)