Legislation Details

File #: Details 2026-118    Version: Name:
Type: TL - Transmission Line Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 6/24/2026 In control: PUC Agenda Meeting
On agenda: 9/17/2026 Final action:
Title: * IP7132/TL-26-132 Coneflower Energy, LLC In the Matter of the Application of Coneflower Energy, LLC for a Route Permit for the Coneflower 345 kV Transmission Line Project in Lyon County, Minnesota. Should the Commission grant a route permit for the proposed project? If granted, what additional conditions or requirements should be included in the route permit? Should the Commission approve and adopt the Applicant’s proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Recommendations for the project as amended by staff? (PUC: Harvieux, Kothlow)
Attachments: 1. Coneflower Initial Filing 4-30-26, 2. Coneflower Initial Filing App A 4-30-26, 3. Coneflower Initial Filing App B 4-30-26, 4. Coneflower Initial Filing App C 4-30-26, 5. Coneflower Initial Filing App D 4-30-26, 6. Coneflower PUBLIC Initial Filing App E 4-30-26, 7. Coneflower Initial Filing App F 4-30-26, 8. Coneflower Initial Filing App G 4-30-26, 9. Coneflower Initial Filing App H 4-30-26, 10. Coneflower Initial Filing App I 4-30-26, 11. Coneflower Initial Filing App J 4-30-26, 12. PUC Letter 5-14-26, 13. PUC Notice 5-14-26, 14. MN DNR Comments 6-15-26, 15. MN DOT Comments 6-15-26, 16. Coneflower Reply Comments 6-16-26, 17. PUC Letter 6-18-26, 18. PUC Comments Scoping Summary and Draft Permit 6-25-26, 19. PUC Order 7-6-26, 20. PUC Notice 7-17-26, 21. Coneflower Direct Testimony of B. Anderson 7-22-26, 22. US Fish & Wildlife Comments 7-29-26, 23. PUC VMPWG Hearing Comments 8-10-26, 24. Coneflower Response 8-17-26, 25. PUC Report 8-20-26, 26. Briefing Papers, 27. New Revised Decision Option, Commissioner Tuma
Date Ver.Action ByActionAction DetailsMeeting Details
No records to display.

title

*                     IP7132/TL-26-132                     Coneflower Energy, LLC

In the Matter of the Application of Coneflower Energy, LLC for a Route Permit for the Coneflower 345 kV Transmission Line Project in Lyon County, Minnesota.

 

1.                     Should the Commission grant a route permit for the proposed project?

2.                     If granted, what additional conditions or requirements should be included in the route permit?

3.                     Should the Commission approve and adopt the Applicant’s proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Recommendations for the project as amended by staff? (PUC: Harvieux, Kothlow)