title
*** E017/M-26-211 Otter Tail Power Co.
In the Matter of Otter Tail Power Co.’s Petition for Approval of a New Class for Very Large Customers Class and Associated Rate Schedules.
Should the Commission approve, reject, or modify Otter Tail Power Company’s proposed structure for establishing Large General Service Tier II based on demand and operational, or adopt an alternative structure?
Should the Commission require Otter Tail Power Company (OTP) to submit compliance filings for loads between 20 MW and 75 MW and require loads deemed “system intensive”, consistent with the Commission’s order in Xcel Energy’s large-load docket, or adopt an alternative approach?
Should the Commission approve, reject, or modify Otter Tail Power Company’s proposal to establish a new customer class, Large General Service Tier III - High Power Compute (HPC) for customers with firm demand of = 75 MW, or adopt an alternative threshold?
Should the Commission require Large General Service Tier III customers to pay all the Transmission and Distribution (T&D) system upgrade costs upfront via Contributions in Aid of Construction (CIAC), no later than upon completion of construction?
Should the Commission approve, reject, or modify Otter Tail Power Company’s proposed System Benefit Contribution (SBC) and the Risk Adder structure under High Power Compute (HPC) rate schedule?
Should the Commission allow Otter Tail Power Company to establish a High-Performance Computing (HPC) System Contribution Rider (formerly the Very Large Customer Tariff Rider) that provides a percentage-based bill credit, subject to annual adjustments and true-up?
Should the Commission approve, reject, or modify Otter Tail Power Company’s proposed contract and billing demand provisions, including the minimum billing requirements, exit fee, term length, and termination period, pre-service termination for Large General Service Tier III – High Power Compute customers, or adopt the alternative ESA term length?
Should the Comm...
Click here for full text