File #: Details 2025-184    Version: 1 Name:
Type: GS - Power Plan Siting Non-wind Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 8/21/2025 In control: PUC Agenda Meeting
On agenda: 9/11/2025 Final action:
Title: ** IP7156/GS-25-126 Lemon Hill Solar, LLC In the Matter of the Application of Lemon Hill Solar, LLC for a Site Permit for the up to 180 MW Lemon Hill Solar Project in Olmsted County, Minnesota. 1. Does the site permit application contain the information required under Minn. R. 7850.3100? 2. Should an advisory task force be appointed? 3. Should the Commission request that an Administrative Law Judge conduct the public hearings and provide a report with findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations on the project? 4. Are there any additional procedural requirements that should be considered? 5. Should the Commission direct the Executive Secretary to issue an authorization to the applicant to initiate consultation with the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)? (PUC: Panait)
Attachments: 1. Lemon Hill Solar Site Permit App 6-20-25, 2. Lemon Hill Solar Site Permit App Figures 6-20-25, 3. Lemon Hill Solar Site Permit App App A 6-20-25, 4. Lemon Hill Solar Site Permit App App B 6-20-25, 5. Lemon Hill Solar Site Permit App App C 6-20-25, 6. Lemon Hill Solar Site Permit App App D 6-20-25, 7. Lemon Hill Solar Site Permit App App E 6-20-25, 8. Lemon Hill Solar Site Permit App App F 6-20-25, 9. Lemon Hill Solar Site Permit App App G 6-20-25, 10. Lemon Hill Solar Site Permit App App H 6-20-25, 11. Lemon Hill Solar Site Permit App App I 6-20-25, 12. Lemon Hill Solar Site Permit App App J 6-20-25, 13. Lemon Hill Solar Site Permit App App K 6-20-25, 14. Lemon Hill Solar Site Permit App App L 6-20-25, 15. Lemon Hill Solar Project Notice 6-20-25, 16. PUC Notice on Application Completeness 7-9-25, 17. Lemon Hill Solar Confirmation Notice 7-17-25, 18. Public Comment Faheena Keefe 7-18-25, 19. Public Comment Deborah Klavetter 7-21-25, 20. Public Comment James Klavetter 7-23-25, 21. PUC EIP Comments 7-23-25, 22. Lemon Hill Solar 1 Reply Comments 7-31-25, 23. Lemon Hill Solar 2 Reply Comments Att 7-31-25, 24. Lemon Hill Solar Supplemental Comments 8-1-25, 25. Lemon Hill Solar Supplemental Comments Att A 8-1-25, 26. Lemon Hill Solar Supplemental Comments Att A.1 8-1-25, 27. Lemon Hill Solar Supplemental Comments Att B.1 8-1-25, 28. Lemon Hill Solar Supplemental Comments Att B.2 8-1-25, 29. Lemon Hill Solar Supplemental Comments Att B.3 8-1-25, 30. Lemon Hill Solar Supplemental Comments Att B.4 8-1-25, 31. Lemon Hill Solar Supplemental Comments Att B.5 8-1-25, 32. Viola Township Comments 8-4-25, 33. Public Comment Michael Jones 8-4-25, 34. Public Comment Deborah Klavetter 8-4-25, 35. Batch 1-9 Public Comments 8-5-25, 36. LiUNA Comments 8-5-25, 37. Batch 1-8 Public Comments 8-5-25, 38. Senator Drazkowski Comments 8-5-25, 39. PUC EIP Response to Reply Comments 8-5-25, 40. Lemon Hill Solar Supplemental Comments 8-21-25, 41. Lemon Hill Solar Site Permit App App C 6-20-25 - Copy, 42. Lemon Hill Solar Site Permit App 6-20-25 - Copy, 43. Lemon Hill Solar Site Permit App Figures 6-20-25 - Copy, 44. Lemon Hill Solar Site Permit App App A 6-20-25 - Copy, 45. Lemon Hill Solar Site Permit App App B 6-20-25 - Copy
Date Ver.Action ByActionAction DetailsMeeting Details
No records to display.

title

**                     IP7156/GS-25-126                     Lemon Hill Solar, LLC

In the Matter of the Application of Lemon Hill Solar, LLC for a Site Permit for the up to 180 MW Lemon Hill Solar Project in Olmsted County, Minnesota.

 

1.                     Does the site permit application contain the information required under Minn. R. 7850.3100?

2.                     Should an advisory task force be appointed?

3.                     Should the Commission request that an Administrative Law Judge conduct the public hearings and provide a report with findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations on the project?

4.                     Are there any additional procedural requirements that should be considered?

5.                     Should the Commission direct the Executive Secretary to issue an authorization to the applicant to initiate consultation with the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)? (PUC: Panait)