Legislation Details

File #: Details 2026-101    Version: 1 Name:
Type: GS - Power Plan Siting Non-wind Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 6/16/2026 In control: PUC Agenda Meeting
On agenda: 7/9/2026 Final action:
Title: ** ??IP7159/ESS-25-205; Lake Charlotte Solar, LLC IP7159/GS-25-206? Lake Charlotte Storage In the Matter of ?Lake Charlotte Solar, LLC's and Lake Charlotte Storage, LLC's Joint Application for the Lake Charlotte 150 MW Solar Facility and 150 MW/600MWh Lake Charlotte Battery Energy Storage System Located in Rutland Township in Martin County, Minnesota?. 1. Should the Commission adopt the Administrative Law Judge's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendations? 2. Should the Commission find that the Environmental Assessment and the record created at the public hearing adequately address the issues identified in the scoping decision? 3. Should the Commission issue a site permit for the up to 150-megawatt Lake Charlotte Solar Project? 4. Should the Commission issue a site permit for the up to 150-megawatt Battery Energy Storage System for the Lake Charlotte Solar Project? (PUC: Panait)
Attachments: 1. LCS 1 Initial Filing 6-3-25, 2. LCS 2 Initial Filing 6-3-25, 3. LCS 3 Initial Filing 6-3-25, 4. LCS 4 Initial Filing 6-3-25, 5. LCS 5 Initial Filing 6-3-25, 6. LCS 6 Initial Filing 6-3-25, 7. LCS 7 Initial Filing 6-3-25, 8. LCS 8 Initial Filing 6-3-25, 9. LCS 9 Initial Filing 6-3-25, 10. LCS 10 Initial Filing 6-3-25, 11. LCS 11 Initial Filing 6-3-25, 12. LCS 12 Initial Filing 6-3-25, 13. PUC Order 7-22-25, 14. PUC Notice 8-7-25, 15. PUC Public Comment - Nicole Howard-Lawton 9-4-25, 16. PUC Public Comment - Dennis Lawton 9-8-25, 17. PUC Public Comment - Tyler Utesch 9-10-25, 18. MNDot Comments 9-16-25, 19. PUC Public Comment - Jennifer Moeller 9-16-25, 20. PUC Public Comment - Dallyn Kotewa 9-16-25, 21. DNR Comments 9-16-25, 22. DNR Natural Heritage Review Letter 9-16-25, 23. PUC Public Comment - Jacy Kosbab 9-17-25, 24. PUC Public Comment - Brenda & Roger Kotewa 9-18-25, 25. PUC EIP Oral Comments 9-23-25, 26. PUC EIP Written Comments 9-23-25, 27. PUC EIP Scoping Letter 9-25-25, 28. CAH Order 9-25-25, 29. PUC Order 10-13-25, 30. CAH Order 10-23-25, 31. PUC EIP Decision 10-29-25, 32. PUC Sample Solar Permit 2-3-26, 33. PUC Sample BESS Permit 2-3-26, 34. PUC EIP 1 EA 2-11-26, 35. PUC EIP 2 EA 2-11-26, 36. PUC EIP 3 EA 2-11-26, 37. PUC EIP 4 EA 2-11-26, 38. PUC EIP 5 EA 2-11-26, 39. PUC Notice 2-11-26, 40. PUC EIP Distribution of EA 2-12-26, 41. LCS 1 Testimony 2-18-26, 42. LCS 2 Testimony 2-18-26, 43. PUC Public Comment - MPCA 3-6-26, 44. LCS Hearing Exhibits 3-6-26, 45. PUC Public Comment Batch 3-12-26, 46. PUC Public Comment - Jennifer Moeller 3-13-26, 47. PUC Public Comment Batch 3-13-26, 48. PUC EIP Hearing Comments 3-13-26, 49. VMPWG Hearing Comments 3-13-26, 50. DNR Comments 3-13-26, 51. LIUNA Comments 3-16-26, 52. PUC Public Comment - Hugh Fraser 3-16-26, 53. PUC Public Comment - Heather Helmich 3-16-26, 54. PUC Public Comment - Isaac & Tania Wallace 3-16-26, 55. PUC Public Comment - Carmen Anders Deling 3-17-26, 56. PUC Public Comment - Morgan Johnson 3-18-26, 57. PUC Public Comment - Kathy Meixell 3-18-26, 58. LCS Response to Hearing Comments 3-25-26, 59. LCS Letter 3-25-26, 60. S&A Transcripts 3-26-26, 61. PUC EIP Reply Comments, FOF 4-9-26, 62. PUC EIP Attachment A - 4-9-26, 63. CAH Report 5-26-26, 64. PUC EIP Exceptions 6-4-26, 65. LCS Exceptions to ALJ 6-10-26, 66. IBEW, LIUNA Exceptions to ALJ 6-10-26, 67. Briefing Papers, 68. Attachments
Date Ver.Action ByActionAction DetailsMeeting Details
No records to display.

title

**                     ​​IP7159/ESS-25-205;                     Lake Charlotte Solar, LLC

                     IP7159/GS-25-206​                      Lake Charlotte Storage

In the Matter of ​Lake Charlotte Solar, LLC’s and Lake Charlotte Storage, LLC’s Joint Application for the Lake Charlotte 150 MW Solar Facility and 150 MW/600MWh Lake Charlotte Battery Energy Storage System Located in Rutland Township in Martin County, Minnesota​.

 

1.                     Should the Commission adopt the Administrative Law Judge’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendations?

2.                     Should the Commission find that the Environmental Assessment and the record created at the public hearing adequately address the issues identified in the scoping decision?

3.                     Should the Commission issue a site permit for the up to 150-megawatt Lake Charlotte Solar Project?

4.                     Should the Commission issue a site permit for the up to 150-megawatt Battery Energy Storage System for the Lake Charlotte Solar Project? (PUC: Panait)