Skip to main content
File #: Details 2026-043    Version: 1 Name:
Type: CN - Certificate of Need Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 3/17/2026 In control: PUC Agenda Meeting
On agenda: 4/9/2026 Final action:
Title: * E015,ET2,E017/CN- Minnesota Power; 25-109; Great River Energy; Otter Tail Power Co. In the Matter of Application of Minnesota Power, Great River Energy, and Otter Tail Power Company for a Certificate of Need for the Maple River to Cuyuna 345kV Transmission Line Project. 1. Should the Commission accept the certificate of need application as substantially complete? 2. Should the Commission authorize review of the certificate of need application using the informal process or refer the matter to the Court of Administrative Hearings for contested case proceedings? 3. Should the Commission consider any additional procedural items? (PUC: Harvieux)
Attachments: 1. Applicants Filing Letter 1-30-26, 2. Applicants Application App A - E 1-30-26, 3. Applicants PUBLIC Application App F - K 1-30-26, 4. Applicants Application App L-M 1-30-26, 5. Applicants Summary of Filing 1-30-26, 6. Anderson, et al. Comments 2-24-26, 7. DOC Comments 2-24-36, 8. MISO Comments 2-24-26, 9. PUC-EIP Comments 2-24-26, 10. Overland Reply Comments 2-27-26, 11. Applicants Reply Comments 3-3-26, 12. Anderson, et al. Supplemental Comments 3-10-26, 13. DOC Supplemental Comments 3-10-26, 14. LIUNA Comments 3-11-26
Date Ver.Action ByActionAction DetailsMeeting Details
No records to display.

title

*                     E015,ET2,E017/CN-                     Minnesota Power;

                     25-109;                     Great River Energy;

                                                               Otter Tail Power Co.

In the Matter of Application of Minnesota Power, Great River Energy, and Otter Tail Power Company for a Certificate of Need for the Maple River to Cuyuna 345kV Transmission Line Project.

 

1.                     Should the Commission accept the certificate of need application as substantially complete?

2.                     Should the Commission authorize review of the certificate of need application using the informal process or refer the matter to the Court of Administrative Hearings for contested case proceedings?

3.                     Should the Commission consider any additional procedural items? (PUC: Harvieux)