File #: Details 2025-274    Version: 1 Name:
Type: CI - Commission Initiated Investigation Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 12/19/2025 In control: PUC Agenda Meeting
On agenda: 1/15/2026 Final action:
Title: ***E-999/CI-24-352 All Electric Utilities In the Matter of a Commission Investigation into a Fuel Life-Cycle Analysis Framework for Utility Compliance with Minnesota's Carbon-Free Standard. Should the Commission adopt a fuel life-cycle analysis framework as part of its responsibility to set criteria and standards for evaluating utility compliance with Minnesota's Carbon-Free Standard? (PUC: Winner)
Attachments: 1. Olmsted County Comments 6-4-25, 2. Red Wing Comments 6-5-25, 3. IATP Comments 6-5-25, 4. API Comments 6-5-25, 5. CSG Comments 6-5-25, 6. CEEM Comments 6-5-25, 7. CEOs Comments 6-5-25, 8. CMPAS Comments 6-5-25, 9. Connexus Comments 6-5-25, 10. CURE Comments 6-5-25, 11. CURE Comments Att A 6-5-25, 12. DOC DER AND MPCA Comments 6-5-25, 13. DOC DER AND MPCA Comments Att A 6-5-25, 14. GRE Comments 6-5-25, 15. HPHC Comments 6-5-25, 16. MFI Comments 6-5-25, 17. MP Comments 6-5-25, 18. Minnkota Comments 6-5-25, 19. MMPA Comments 6-5-25, 20. OTP Comments 6-5-25, 21. PFPI Comments 6-5-25, 22. Partnership on W&E Comments 6-5-25, 23. Ramsey Washington W&E Comments 6-5-25, 24. Xcel Comments 6-5-25, 25. MFRC Comments 6-6-25, 26. MFRC Comments Att 1 6-6-25, 27. MFRC Comments Att 2 6-6-25, 28. CEOs Reply Comments 8-20-25, 29. CEOs Reply Comments App A 8-20-25, 30. CMPAS Reply Comments 8-20-25, 31. CMPAS Reply Comments Att A 8-20-25, 32. CURE Reply Comments 8-20-25, 33. CURE Reply Hibbard Letter 2022 8-20-25, 34. CURE Reply Hibbard Letter 2025 8-20-25, 35. DOC PUBLIC Reply Comments 8-20-25, 36. Great River Energy Reply Comments 8-20-25, 37. MMPA Reply Comments 8-20-25, 38. MP Reply Comments 8-20-25, 39. OTP Reply Comments 8-20-25, 40. SPC and DE Reply Comments 8-20-25, 41. Xcel Reply Comments 8-20-25, 42. DFL Environmental Caucus Comments 9-3-25, 43. Coalition for Plastic Reduction Comments 9-10-25, 44. Public Comments 1-20, Batch 1 9-12-25, 45. Public Comments 1-20, Batch 2 9-12-25, 46. HPHC 1 Supplemental Comments 9-13-25, 47. HPHC 1 Supplemental Comments Att 2010 Study 9-13-25, 48. HPHC 1 Supplemental Comments Att Article 9-13-25, 49. Public Comments 1-25, Batch 1 9-16-25, 50. Climate Generation Comments 9-16-25, 51. Eureka Recycling Comments 9-16-25, 52. AF&PA Comments 9-17-25, 53. AF&PA Comments App 1 9-17-25, 54. AF&PA Comments App 2 9-17-25, 55. CEOs Supplemental Comments 9-17-25, 56. CMPAS Supplemental Comments 9-17-25, 57. Connexus Supplemental Comments 9-17-25, 58. CURE Supplemental Comments 9-17-25, 59. CURE Supplemental Comments Att A 9-17-25, 60. CURE Supplemental Comments Att B 9-17-25, 61. CURE Supplemental Comments Att C 9-17-25, 62. DOC Supplemental Comments 9-17-25, 63. ILSR Comments 9-17-25, 64. Legislative Members Comments 9-17-25, 65. LIUNA Comments 9-17-25, 66. MP Supplemental Comments 9-17-25, 67. LIUNA Supplemental Comments 9-17-25, 68. MMPA Supplemental Comments 9-17-25, 69. MN EJ Table and Zero Turn Comments 9-17-25, 70. MRRA Comments 9-17-25, 71. MPCA Supplemental Comments 9-17-25, 72. PFPI Supplemental Comments 9-17-25, 73. PFPI Supplemental Comments Att A 9-17-25, 74. Partnership on W&E Supplemental Comments 9-17-25, 75. Interfaith Supplemental Comments 9-18-25, 76. MEP Supplemental Comments 9-18-25, 77. Senator Nick Frentz Comments 9-81-25, 78. Vote Solar Comments 9-18-25, 79. Public Comments 1-11, Batch 1 9-18-25, 80. DOC DER AND MPCA Info Request Response 12-11-25, 81. Joint Commentors Comments 7-28-25, 82. Northeast Metro Climate Action Comments 9-17-25, 83. Briefing Papers, 84. Corrected Briefing Papers - Clean, 85. Corrected Briefing Papers - Redline, 86. New, Revised, and Preferred Decision Options - Commissiner Partridge
Date Ver.Action ByActionAction DetailsMeeting Details
No records to display.

title

***E-999/CI-24-352                     All Electric Utilities

In the Matter of a Commission Investigation into a Fuel Life-Cycle Analysis Framework for Utility Compliance with Minnesota’s Carbon-Free Standard.

 

Should the Commission adopt a fuel life-cycle analysis framework as part of its responsibility to set criteria and standards for evaluating utility compliance with Minnesota’s Carbon-Free Standard? (PUC: Winner)