File #: Details 2017-211    Version: Name:
Type: CN - Certificate of Need Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 10/9/2017 In control: PUC Agenda Meeting
On agenda: 3/15/2018 Final action:
Title: ** PL9/CN-14-916; Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership PL9/PPL-15-137 In the Matter of the Application of Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership for a Certificate of Need for the Proposed Line 3 Replacement Project in Minnesota from the North Dakota Border to the Wisconsin Border; In the Matter of the Application of Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership for a Route Permit for the Proposed Line 3 Replacement Project in Minnesota from the North Dakota Border to the Wisconsin Border. 1. Should the Commission adopt the administrative law judge's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendation? 2. Should the Commission find that the revised Final Environmental Impact Statement is adequate? (PUC: Ek)
Attachments: 1. EIS Scoping Decision Document 12-5-16, 2. ALJ Report on Final EIS Adequacy 11-1-17, 3. DOC EERA Exceptions 11-21-17, 4. REVISED 2 Briefing Paper - FEIS Adequacy Determination Line 3 14-916 and 15-137 12-5-17, 5. PUC Order Finding Environmental Impact Statement Inadequate 12-14-17, 6. Enbridge Comments on Revised FEIS 2-27-18, 7. Fond du Lac Band Comments on Revised FEIS 2-27-18, 8. Friends of the Headwaters Comments on Revised FEIS 2-27-18, 9. Honor the Earth Comments on Revised FEIS 2-27-18, 10. Mille Lacs Band Comments on Revised FEIS 2-27-18, 11. Sierra Club Comments on Revised FEIS 2-27-18, 12. Briefing Papers 14-916 15-137 3-8-18
Related files: Details 2015-134

title

**                     PL9/CN-14-916;                     Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership

                     PL9/PPL-15-137

In the Matter of the Application of Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership for a Certificate of Need for the Proposed Line 3 Replacement Project in Minnesota from the North Dakota Border to the Wisconsin Border;

In the Matter of the Application of Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership for a Route Permit for the Proposed Line 3 Replacement Project in Minnesota from the North Dakota Border to the Wisconsin Border.

 

1.                     Should the Commission adopt the administrative law judge’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendation?

2.                     Should the Commission find that the revised Final Environmental Impact Statement is adequate? (PUC: Ek)