Legislation Details

File #: Details 2026-096    Version: Name:
Type: M - Miscellaneous Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 6/3/2026 In control: PUC Agenda Meeting
On agenda: 11/24/2026 Final action:
Title: *** E015/M-26-126 Minnesota Power In the Matter of the Petition of Minnesota Power for Approval of Modifications of its Very Large Power Customer Class and Tariff Proposal. Should the Commission approve, reject, or Modify Minnesota Power’s proposed Very Large Customer Tariff and associated rider revisions? Should the Commission approve, reject, or modify the VLP Cost Test? Should the Commission set the demand size threshold for the new tariffs at 100 MW, or adopt an alternative threshold? Should the Commission include additional criteria when determining tariff applicability? Should the Commission modify the minimum ESA term length? Should the Commission modify the minimum billing demand and exit fee calculations? Should the Commission determine that the Petition complies with Minn. Stat. § 216B.1622? Should the Commission require MP to submit recurring reports detailing the number of new large customer requests, signed ESAs, total capacity, and participation in load flexibilit...
Attachments: 1. MP Petition 7-15-26, 2. Google Initial Comments 8-28-26, 3. LPI Initial Comments 8-28-26, 4. OAG PUBLIC Initial Comments 8-28-26, 5. CUB Initial Comments 8-28-26, 6. DOC Initial Comments 8-28-26, 7. CEO Initial Comments 8-28-26, 8. Comity Reply Comments 9-14-26, 9. MP Reply Comments 9-18-26, 10. CEO Reply Comments 9-18-26, 11. Google Reply Comments 9-18-26, 12. LIUNA Supplemental Comments 10-9-26, 13. LPI Response to Reply Comments 10-9-26, 14. Google Supplemental Comments 10-9-26, 15. Google Supplemental Comments Att 10-9-26, 16. OAG PUBLIC Response to Reply Comments 10-9-26, 17. CURE Supplemental Comments 10-9-26, 18. MP Response to Reply Comments 10-9-26, 19. CUB Supplemental Comments 10-9 -26, 20. DOC Supplemental Comments 10-9-26, 21. Google Proposed Decision Options 11-3-26, 22. CEO Proposed Decision Options 11-3-26, 23. MP Proposed Decision Options 11-3-26, 24. OAG, CUB, CURE, LPI, DOC Joint Proposed Decision Options 11-3-26, 25. Briefing Papers
Date Ver.Action ByActionAction DetailsMeeting Details
No records to display.

title

***                     E015/M-26-126                     Minnesota Power

In the Matter of the Petition of Minnesota Power for Approval of Modifications of its Very Large Power Customer Class and Tariff Proposal.

 

1.                     Should the Commission approve, reject, or Modify Minnesota Power’s proposed Very Large Customer Tariff and associated rider revisions?

2.                     Should the Commission approve, reject, or modify the VLP Cost Test? 

3.                     Should the Commission set the demand size threshold for the new tariffs at 100 MW, or adopt an alternative threshold?

4.                     Should the Commission include additional criteria when determining tariff applicability?

5.                     Should the Commission modify the minimum ESA term length?

6.                     Should the Commission modify the minimum billing demand and exit fee calculations?

7.                     Should the Commission determine that the Petition complies with Minn. Stat. § 216B.1622?

8.                     Should the Commission require MP to submit recurring reports detailing the number of new large customer requests, signed ESAs, total capacity, and participation in load flexibility and clean energy programs? (PUC: Andringa, Brown-Huss, Li)