File #: Details 2024-011    Version: Name:
Type: TL - Transmission Line Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 1/5/2024 In control: PUC Agenda Meeting
On agenda: 11/21/2024 Final action:
Title: * ET2/TL-23-410 Great River Energy In the Matter of the Application of Great River Energy for a Route Permit for the 115-kV Pilot Knob to Burnsville Rebuild and Upgrade Project in Dakota County, Minnesota. 1. Should the Commission adopt the administrative law judge's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendation? 2. Should the Commission find that the environmental assessment and the record created at the public hearing adequately address the issues identified in the scoping decision? 3. Should the Commission issue a route permit identifying a specific route and permit conditions for the 115-kV Pilot Knob to Burnsville Rebuild and Upgrade Project? (PUC: Culbertson)
Attachments: 1. 1 GRE Initial Filing 11-17-23, 2. 2 GRE Initial Filing 11-17-23, 3. 3 GRE Initial Filing 11-17-23, 4. 4 GRE Initial Filing 11-17-23, 5. 5 GRE Initial Filing 11-17-23, 6. 6 GRE Initial Filing 11-17-23, 7. 7 GRE Initial Filing 11-17-23, 8. 8 GRE Initial Filing 11-17-23, 9. 9 GRE Initial Filing 11-17-23, 10. 10 GRE Initial Filing 11-17-23, 11. 11 GRE Initial Filing 11-17-23, 12. 12 GRE Initial Filing 11-17-23, 13. 13 GRE Initial Filing 11-17-23, 14. Order 1-17-24, 15. Order 4-16-24, 16. DOC EERA Scoping Decision 5-1-24, 17. 1 DOC EERA EA 8-1-24, 18. 2 DOC EERA EA 8-1-24, 19. 3 DOC EERA EA 8-1-24, 20. 4 DOC EERA EA 8-1-24, 21. GRE Direct Testimony of M. Strohfus 8-7-24, 22. Aaron Jaeger Public Comment 8-20-24, 23. Aaron Jaeger Public Comment 8-22-24, 24. GRE Comments and Proposed FOF 9-10-24, 25. DOC EERA Comments on Proposed Findings 9-23-24, 26. OAH FOF, Conclusions & Recommendations 10-24-24, 27. GRE Exceptions 11-7-24, 28. Second Revised Briefing Papers
Date Ver.Action ByActionAction DetailsMeeting Details
No records to display.

title

*                     ET2/TL-23-410                     Great River Energy

In the Matter of the Application of Great River Energy for a Route Permit for the 115-kV Pilot Knob to Burnsville Rebuild and Upgrade Project in Dakota County, Minnesota.

 

1.                     Should the Commission adopt the administrative law judge’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendation?

2.                     Should the Commission find that the environmental assessment and the record created at the public hearing adequately address the issues identified in the scoping decision?

3.                     Should the Commission issue a route permit identifying a specific route and permit conditions for the 115-kV Pilot Knob to Burnsville Rebuild and Upgrade Project? (PUC: Culbertson)