File #: Details 2013-277    Version: Name:
Type: WS - Wind Power Plant Siting Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 10/16/2013 In control: PUC Agenda Meeting
On agenda: 9/11/2025 Final action:
Title: IP6914/WS-13-843 Clearlight Energy Holdings, L.P., doing business as Odell Wind Farm, LLC In the Matter of the Application of Odell Wind Farm, LLC for a Large Wind Energy Conversion System Site Permit for the 200-Megawatt (MW) Wind Project in Cottonwood, Jackson, Martin and Watonwan Counties, Minnesota. 1. Should the Commission approve the permit amendment request? 2. If the amendment request is approved, should any conditions be required? 3. Are there other issues or concerns related to this matter? (PUC: Lobby; EIP: Davis)
Attachments: 1. Application pt 1 of 9 9-26-13, 2. 13-843 Odell Comments 12-27-13 201312-94939-01, 3. Application pt 2 of 9 9-26-13, 4. 13-843 DNR Comments 12-27-13 1of2 201312-94936-01, 5. Application pt 3 of 9 9-26-13, 6. 13-843 DNR Comments 12-27-13 2of2 201312-94936-02, 7. Application pt 4 of 9 9-26-13, 8. 13-843 MNDOT 12-27-13 201312-94940-01, 9. Application pt 5 of 9 9-26-13, 10. DOC EERA Proposed Draft Permit 2-7-14, 11. Application pt 6 of 9 9-26-13, 12. Site Permit Template 2-18-14, 13. Application pt 7 of 9 9-26-13, 14. PUC Briefing Papers 2-26-14, 15. PUC Briefing Papers 2-26-14, 16. Application pt 8 of 9 9-26-13, 17. Application pt 9 of 9 9-26-13, 18. DOC EERA Comments 10-11-13, 19. Odell Wind Farm Reply Comments 10-18-13, 20. PUC Briefing Papers 10-25-13

title

                     IP6914/WS-13-843                     Clearlight Energy Holdings, L.P., doing

                                                               business as Odell Wind Farm, LLC

In the Matter of the Application of Odell Wind Farm, LLC for a Large Wind Energy Conversion System Site Permit for the 200-Megawatt (MW) Wind Project in Cottonwood, Jackson, Martin and Watonwan Counties, Minnesota.

 

1.                     Should the Commission approve the permit amendment request?

2.                     If the amendment request is approved, should any conditions be required?

3.                     Are there other issues or concerns related to this matter? (PUC: Lobby; EIP: Davis)