Legislation Details

File #: Details 2026-160    Version: 1 Name:
Type: M - Miscellaneous Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 8/20/2026 In control: PUC Agenda Meeting
On agenda: 9/10/2026 Final action:
Title: *** E-015/RP-25-127 Minnesota Power In the Matter of Minnesota Power's 2025-2039 Integrated Resource Plan. 1. Should the Commission approve, reject, or modify the resource additions proposed in Minnesota Power's 2025-2039 Integrated Resource Plan, including its Base Plan, Growth Plan, and resources to support the proposed Google ESA? 2. Has Minnesota Power complied with the relevant Commission Orders? 3. What resource acquisition process should Minnesota Power use to implement its approved plan? 4. When should Minnesota Power file its next IRP? (PUC: Ricker, Winner, Stalpes, Li)
Attachments: 1. Order (21-33) 1-9-23, 2. MP 2025-2039 Integrated Resource Plan 3-3-25, 3. MP PUBLIC Initial Filing App A 3-3-25, 4. MP Initial Filing App B 3-3-25, 5. MP Initial Filing App C 3-3-25, 6. MP Initial Filing App D 3-31-25, 7. MP Initial Filing App E 3-31-25, 8. MP PUBLIC Initial Filing App F 3-31-25, 9. MP Initial Filing App I 3-31-25, 10. MP PUBLIC Initial Filing App J 3-3-25, 11. MP PUBLIC Initial Filing App K 3-31-25, 12. MP Initial Filing App L 3-3-25, 13. MP Initial Filing App N 3-31-25, 14. MP Initial Filing App O 3-31-25, 15. MP Supplemental Comments 1-15-26, 16. ETAC Initial Comments 10-13-25, 17. MP Comments 3-13-26, 18. DOC PUBLIC Comments 4-21-26, 19. DOC PUBLIC Comments Att 7 4-21-26, 20. CEO PUBLIC Initial Comments 4-20-26, 21. CEO PUBLIC Initial Comments Att A 4-20-26, 22. CEO Initial Comments Att C 4-20-26, 23. LPI PUBLIC Initial Comments 4-20-26, 24. OAG RUD Initial Comments 4-20-26, 25. CURE Initial Comments 4-20-26, 26. HPHC Initial Comments 4-21-26, 27. LIUNA Initial Comments 4-21-26, 28. MP PUBLIC Reply Comments 5-18-26, 29. DOC Reply Comments 5-18-26, 30. CEO PUBLIC Reply Comments 5-18-26, 31. LPI Reply Comments 5-18-26, 32. IUOE Reply Comments 5-18-26, 33. Itasca Co Reply Comments 5-18-26, 34. LIUNA Reply Comments 5-18-26, 35. City of Cohasset Public Comment 5-14-26, 36. City of Grand Rapids Public Comment 5-14-26, 37. IEDC Public Comment 5-18-26, 38. Duluth Izaak Walton League Public Comment 5-19-26, 39. MNIPL Public Comment 5-19-26, 40. DOC Supplemental Comments Kevala Report 6-5-26, 41. DOC TS Supplemental Comments 6-15-26, 42. DOC PUBLIC Supplemental Comments 6-15-26, 43. CEO TS Supplemental Comments 6-15-26, 44. CEO PUBLIC Supplemental Comments 6-15-26, 45. LPI Supplemental Comments 6-15-26, 46. MP Supplemental Comments 6-15-26, 47. OAG-RUD TS Supplemental Comments 6-15-26, 48. OAG-RUD PUBLIC Supplemental Comments 6-15-26, 49. CURE Supplemental Comments 6-15-26, 50. ELPC-VS Supplemental Comments 6-15-26, 51. IBEW Supplemental Comments 6-15-26, 52. LIUNA Supplemental Comments 6-15-26, 53. SUN Supplemental Comments 6-15-26, 54. WPPI Supplemental Comments 6-15-26, 55. LPI Letter 7-21-26, 56. CEO Response to Supplemental Comments 7-8-26, 57. PUC Order 4-18-25, 58. DOC Comments on Completeness 5-9-25, 59. MP PUBLIC Comments on Completeness 6-27-25, 60. CAH-OAH Report Summarizing Public Meetings and Comments 9-26-25, 61. MP Supplemental Filing Nemadji Trial Update 12-19-25, 62. DOC Comments Clean Firm Plan Modeling Files 2-17-26, 63. MP Supplemental Letter Clean Firm Plan Modeling Files 2-25-26, 64. 24-198 PUC Order 12-10-25, 65. 17-568 PUC Order 5-21-26, 66. 17-568 MP Compliance Filing 6-18-26, 67. 17-568 MP Compliance Filing 8-14-26, 68. Briefing Papers PUBLIC
Date Ver.Action ByActionAction DetailsMeeting Details
No records to display.

title

***                     E-015/RP-25-127                     Minnesota Power

                     In the Matter of Minnesota Power’s 2025-2039 Integrated Resource Plan.

 

1.                     Should the Commission approve, reject, or modify the resource additions proposed in Minnesota Power’s 2025-2039 Integrated Resource Plan, including its Base Plan, Growth Plan, and resources to support the proposed Google ESA?

2.                     Has Minnesota Power complied with the relevant Commission Orders? 

3.                     What resource acquisition process should Minnesota Power use to implement its approved plan?

4.                     When should Minnesota Power file its next IRP? (PUC: Ricker, Winner, Stalpes, Li)