File #: Details 2014-289    Version: Name:
Type: C - Complaint Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 10/2/2014 In control: PUC Agenda Meeting
On agenda: 9/24/2015 Final action:
Title: ** P6716,5615/C-l4-383 Charter Fiberlink CCO, LLC; Charter Fiberlink CC VIII; Charter Advanced Services (MN), LLC; Charter Advanced Services VIII (MN), LLC In the Matter of the Complaint by the Minnesota Department of Commerce (DOC) against the Charter Affiliates regarding Transfer of Customers. 1. Should the Commission reconsider or reopen its July 28th Order? 2. If so, should the July 28th Order be modified? (PUC: O'Grady) Please Note: Minn. Rules 7829.3000, subp. 6, states that "[t]he commission shall decide a petition for rehearing, amendment, vacation, reconsideration, or reargument with or without a hearing or oral argument. The commission may vacate or stay the order, or part of the order, that is the subject of the petition, pending action on the petition."
Attachments: 1. Order Finding Jurisdiction and Requiring Compliance Filing 7-28-15, 2. DOC Complaint 9-26-14 PUBLIC, 3. DOC Complaint Supplement-Relief Requested 10-22-14, 4. Charter Petition for Rehearing 8-17-15, 5. Briefing Papers, 6. DOC Comments 8-27-15, 7. Order Requiring Answer to Complaint 11-18-14, 8. OAG Comments 8-27-15, 9. Charter Comments 10-22-14 PUBLIC, 10. Charter Answer to Complaint 12-18-14, 11. Briefing Papers, 12. DOC Comments 10-22-14, 13. OAG RUD Comments 1-16-15, 14. Comm on Deaf, DeafBlind & Hard of Hearing Comments 1-28-15, 15. Charter Reply Comments 1-30-15, 16. Legal Svcs Advocacy Proj & MN Community Action Partnership Reply Comments 2-2-15, 17. DOC Complaint 9-26-14 PUBLIC, 18. Charter Petition for Dismissal of Complaint 10-22-14 PUBLIC, 19. DOC Comments 1-20-15 PUBLIC, 20. Briefing Papers, 21. Revised Decision Options 5-5-15

title

**                     P6716,5615/C-l4-383                     Charter Fiberlink CCO, LLC;

                                                               Charter Fiberlink CC VIII;

                                                               Charter Advanced Services (MN), LLC;

                                                               Charter Advanced Services VIII (MN), LLC

In the Matter of the Complaint by the Minnesota Department of Commerce (DOC) against the Charter Affiliates regarding Transfer of Customers.

 

1.                     Should the Commission reconsider or reopen its July 28th Order?

2.                     If so, should the July 28th Order be modified? (PUC: O’Grady)

 

Please Note: Minn. Rules 7829.3000, subp. 6, states that "[t]he commission shall decide a petition for rehearing, amendment, vacation, reconsideration, or reargument with or without a hearing or oral argument. The commission may vacate or stay the order, or part of the order, that is the subject of the petition, pending action on the petition.”