File #: Details 2014-327    Version: 1 Name:
Type: M - Miscellaneous Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 11/5/2014 In control: PUC Agenda Meeting
On agenda: 11/24/2014 Final action:
Title: ** G011/M-14-369 Minnesota Energy Resources Corporation In the Matter of MERC's 2013 Demand Side Management Financial Incentives and Annual Filing to Update the CIP Rider. 1. Should the Commission approve MERC's 2013 CIP tracker account? 2. Should the Commission approve an incentive of $2,492,730 for MERC'S 2013 CIP achievements? 3. At what level should the Commission set the conservation cost recovery adjustment (CCRA) for 2014/2015? 4. Should the Commission approve MERC's proposed bill message with the appropriate modifications to reflect an accurate effective date and gas CIP Adjustment Factor as determined by the Commission? 5. Should the Commission find that MERC has complied with the Commission's Order in Docket No. G011/M-13-369 regarding the filing of conservation cost repayment adjustment schedules? 6. Should the Commission eliminate the carrying charge or otherwise modify its application to MERC's tracker balance for the CIP rider effective with the date of the Commi...
Attachments: 1. DOC Comments 9-2-14, 2. MERC Reply Comments 9-12-14, 3. PUC Order in Dkt 14-201 9-26-14, 4. DOC Reply Comments 10-9-14, 5. MERC Additional Reply Comments 10-14-14, 6. MERC Initial Filing 5-1-14 PUBLIC, 7. MERC Revised Petition 8-25-14 PUBLIC, 8. MERC Compliance Filing 9-15-14 PUBLIC, 9. Briefing Papers
title
**      G011/M-14-369      Minnesota Energy Resources Corporation
In the Matter of MERC's 2013 Demand Side Management Financial Incentives and Annual Filing to Update the CIP Rider.
 
1.      Should the Commission approve MERC's 2013 CIP tracker account?
2.      Should the Commission approve an incentive of $2,492,730 for MERC'S 2013 CIP achievements?
3.      At what level should the Commission set the conservation cost recovery adjustment (CCRA) for 2014/2015?
4.      Should the Commission approve MERC's proposed bill message with the appropriate modifications to reflect an accurate effective date and gas CIP Adjustment Factor as determined by the Commission?
5.      Should the Commission find that MERC has complied with the Commission's Order in Docket No. G011/M-13-369 regarding the filing of conservation cost repayment adjustment schedules?
6.      Should the Commission eliminate the carrying charge or otherwise modify its application to MERC's tracker balance for the CIP rider effective with the date of the Commission's Order? (PUC: Fournier)