File #: Details 2015-274    Version: Name:
Type: TL - Transmission Line Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 9/10/2015 In control: PUC Agenda Meeting
On agenda: 7/29/2016 Final action:
Title: ** ET2/TL-15-423 Great River Energy In the Matter of the Application of Great River Energy for a Route Permit under the Alternative Permitting Process for the Palisade 115 kV Project near the city of Palisade, Minnesota. * Should the Commission issue findings of fact and conclusions demonstrating that the alternative permitting process has been conducted in accordance with Minn. Stat. ? 216E.04 and Minn. R. 7850.2800 to 7850.3900? * Should the Commission find that the environmental assessment and the record created at the public hearing adequately address the issues identified in the scoping decision? * Should the Commission grant a route permit for the Palisade 115 kV Transmission Line Project? * Should the Commission require specific conditions if the route permit is granted? (PUC: Kaluzniak)
Attachments: 1. Notice of Intent to File Application 5-4-15, 2. GRE Initial Filing pt 1 of 6 08-25-2015, 3. GRE Initial Filing pt 2 of 6 08-25-2015, 4. GRE Initial Filing pt 3 of 6 08-25-2015, 5. GRE Initial Filing pt 4 of 6 08-25-2015, 6. GRE Initial Filing pt 5 of 6 08-25-2015, 7. GRE Initial Filing pt 6 of 6 08-25-2015, 8. DOC EERA EA Scoping Decision 12-22-15, 9. DOC EERA Additional Landowner Notification 2-19-16, 10. DOC EERA Alternate Route Landowner Notification 2-23-16, 11. DOC EERA Environmental Assessment Report-all pts 4-21-16, 12. MN DNR Comments-all pts 5-16-16, 13. GRE Proposed Findings of Fact 5-24-16, 14. GRE Comments on the Draft Route Permit 5-26-16, 15. ALJ Summary of Public Testimony 6-17-16, 16. DOC EERA Proposed Finding Of Fact 6-30-16, 17. Briefing Papers, 18. Revised Decision Options

title

**                     ET2/TL-15-423                     Great River Energy

In the Matter of the Application of Great River Energy for a Route Permit under the Alternative Permitting Process for the Palisade 115 kV Project near the city of Palisade, Minnesota.

 

                     Should the Commission issue findings of fact and conclusions demonstrating that the alternative permitting process has been conducted in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 216E.04 and Minn. R. 7850.2800 to 7850.3900?

                     Should the Commission find that the environmental assessment and the record created at the public hearing adequately address the issues identified in the scoping decision?

                     Should the Commission grant a route permit for the Palisade 115 kV Transmission Line Project?

                     Should the Commission require specific conditions if the route permit is granted? (PUC: Kaluzniak)