File #: Details 2016-042    Version: 1 Name:
Type: M - Miscellaneous Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 3/3/2016 In control: PUC Agenda Meeting
On agenda: 3/24/2016 Final action:
Title: * G002/M-16-40 Northern States Power Company d/b/a Xcel Energy In the Matter of the Petition of Northern States Power Company (Xcel) for Approval of Extension Surcharge (ES) for Ulen, Hitterdal, and Surrounding Communities. Should the Commission approve Northern States Power Company's (Xcel) proposed Extension Surcharge (ES) rider for the communities of Ulen, Hitterdal, and the Surrounding Areas? Should the Commission approve Xcel's proposed 75 foot service line extension allowance for its NAS/ES riders' tariff sheets? Should the Commission approve Xcel's proposed Assignment and Assumption Agreement between Greater Minnesota Transmission (GMT), West Central AG Services, and Xcel? Should the Commission accept Xcel's proposed revision of the service area for the Barnesville and Holdingford ES riders approved in Docket Nos. G-002/M-14-583 and G-002/M-15-195? Should the Commission accept Xcel's proposal to continue its annual NAS/ES project reporting requirements on March 1 of eac...
Attachments: 1. DOC Comments 2-11-16, 2. Xcel Reply Comments 2-18-16, 3. Xcel Petition 1-12-16 PUBLIC, 4. Briefing Papers

title

*                     G002/M-16-40                     Northern States Power Company d/b/a Xcel Energy

In the Matter of the Petition of Northern States Power Company (Xcel) for Approval of Extension Surcharge (ES) for Ulen, Hitterdal, and Surrounding Communities.

 

Should the Commission approve Northern States Power Company's (Xcel)

proposed Extension Surcharge (ES) rider for the communities of Ulen, Hitterdal, and the Surrounding Areas?

Should the Commission approve Xcel's proposed 75 foot service line extension allowance for its NAS/ES riders' tariff sheets?

Should the Commission approve Xcel's proposed Assignment and Assumption Agreement between Greater Minnesota Transmission (GMT), West Central AG Services, and Xcel?

Should the Commission accept Xcel's proposed revision of the service area for the Barnesville and Holdingford ES riders approved in Docket Nos. G-002/M-14-583 and G-002/M-15-195?

Should the Commission accept Xcel's proposal to continue its annual NAS/ES project reporting requirements on March 1 of each year, pursuant to Docket No. G-002/M-14-583? (PUC: Brill)