Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Bookmark and Share
File #: Details 2016-159    Version: 1 Name:
Type: M - Miscellaneous Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 8/10/2016 In control: PUC Agenda Meeting
On agenda: 9/15/2016 Final action:
Title: ** E017/M-16-533 Otter Tail Power Company In the Matter of a Petition by Otter Tail Power (OTP) for a Competitive Rate for Energy-Intensive Trade-Exposed (EITE) Customers and an EITE Cost Recovery Rider; 1. Should the Commission approve, modify, or reject Otter Tail Power's proposed EITE Rate Rider pursuant to Minn. Stat. ? 216B.1696? 2. Should the Commission approve, modify, or reject Otter Tail Power's proposed EITE Cost Recovery Rider at this time or defer the matter to Otter Tail Power's next general rate case? (PUC: O'Grady, Kaml)
Attachments: 1. Brandt Affidavit Public no ts 6-28-16, 2. OTP Comments 7-21-16, 3. OTP Comments 8-1-16, 4. DOC DER Comments 8-1-16, 5. OTP Reply Comments 8-11-16, 6. OTP EITE Reply Comments 8-11-16, 7. OTP Initial Filing Public 6-27-16, 8. OTP EITE Comments Public 6-28-16, 9. Aube Affidavit Public 6-28-16, 10. Aube Affidavit Amended Public 7-11-16, 11. Wallingford Affidavit Public 6-28-16, 12. Wallingford Affidavit Amended Public 7-11-16, 13. Goetz Affidavit Public 6-28-16, 14. OAG RUD Comments Public 8-1-16, 15. OTP Supplemental Comments 9-13-16, 16. Briefing Papers

title

**                     E017/M-16-533                     Otter Tail Power Company

In the Matter of a Petition by Otter Tail Power (OTP) for a Competitive Rate for Energy-Intensive Trade-Exposed (EITE) Customers and an EITE Cost Recovery Rider;

 

1.                     Should the Commission approve, modify, or reject Otter Tail Power’s proposed EITE Rate Rider pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 216B.1696?

2.                     Should the Commission approve, modify, or reject Otter Tail Power’s proposed EITE Cost Recovery Rider at this time or defer the matter to Otter Tail Power’s next general rate case? (PUC: O’Grady, Kaml)