File #: Details 2019-097    Version: 1 Name:
Type: CN - Certificate of Need Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 6/6/2019 In control: PUC Agenda Meeting
On agenda: 6/27/2019 Final action:
Title: * E002,ET6675/CN-17-184; Xcel Energy; E002,ET6675/TL-17-185 ITC Midwest In the Matter of the Application of Xcel Energy and ITC Midwest LLC for a Certificate of Need and Route Permit for the Huntley-Wilmarth 345 kV Transmission Line Project. 1. Should the Commission find that the environmental impact statement is adequate? 2. Should the Commission adopt the Administrative Law Judge's Findings of Fact, Conclusion of Law, and Recommendations? 3. Should the Commission grant a certificate of need for the Huntley Wilmarth Transmission Line Project? 4. Should the Commission issue a route permit identifying a specific route and permit conditions for the Huntley Wilmarth Transmission Line Project? (PUC: DeBleeckere)
Attachments: 1. 17-184 1 Xcel - Application - 1-17-2018, 2. 17-184 2 Xcel - Application - 1-17-2018, 3. 17-184 3 Xcel - Application - 1-17-2018, 4. 17-184 4 Xcel - Application - 1-17-2018, 5. 17-184 5 Xcel - Application - 1-17-2018, 6. 17-184 6 Xcel - Application - 1-17-2018, 7. 17-184 7 Xcel - Application - 1-17-2018, 8. 17-184 8 Xcel - Application - 1-17-2018, 9. 17-184 9 Xcel - Application - 1-17-2018, 10. 17-185 1 Xcel - Application - 1-22-2018, 11. 17-185 2 Xcel - Application - 1-22-2018, 12. 17-185 3 Xcel - Application - 1-22-2018, 13. 17-185 4 Xcel - Application - 1-22-2018, 14. 17-185 5 Xcel - Application - 1-22-2018, 15. 17-185 6 Xcel - Application - 1-22-2018, 16. 17-185 7 Xcel - Application - 1-22-2018, 17. 17-185 8 Xcel - Application - 1-22-2018, 18. 17-185 9 Xcel - Application - 1-22-2018, 19. 17-185 10 Xcel - Application - 1-22-2018, 20. PUC - Order - 3-28-2018, 21. DOC EERA - Final EIS - 4-3-2019, 22. OAH - ALJ Report - 5-22-2019, 23. DOC DER - Exceptions 6-4-2019, 24. North Mankato - Exceptions to ALJ Report - 6-6-2019, 25. Xcel - Exceptions to ALJ Report - 6-6-2019, 26. 17-184 DOC DER - Exceptions 6-6-2019, 27. Brief Initial - CEO Post Hearing, 28. Brief Initial - DOC DER Post Hearing, 29. Brief Initial - MISO Post Hearing, 30. Brief Initial - North Mankato Post Hearing, 31. Brief Initial - Xcel and ITC Post Hearing, 32. Brief Initial -Xcel and ITC Post Hearing - Errata, 33. Brief Reply - DOC DER, 34. Brief Reply - North Mankato, 35. Brief Reply - Xcel and ITC Post Hearing, 36. Exhibit List - with Hyperlinks to All Record Documents, 37. FEIS - 01_Huntley to Wilmarth FEIS, 38. FEIS - 02_Appendices, 39. FEIS - 03_Appendix I_Mapbook, 40. FEIS - 04_Appendix L_Comments and Responses, 41. Testimony Direct - CEOs - Goggins, 42. Testimony Direct - DOC Johnson, 43. Testimony Direct - DOC Landi - Errata Redlined, 44. Testimony Direct - DOC Landi, 45. Testimony Direct - DOC Rakow - Errata Redlined, 46. Testimony Direct - DOC Rakow, 47. Testimony Direct - MISO - Zhou, 48. Testimony Direct - N. Mankato - Fischer, 49. Testimony Direct - Xcel and ITC - Abing, 50. Testimony Direct - Xcel and ITC - Hillstrom, 51. Testimony Direct - Xcel and ITC - Neidermire, 52. Testimony Direct - Xcel and ITC - Peterson, 53. Testimony Direct - Xcel and ITC - Siebenaler, 54. Testimony Direct - Xcel and ITC - Stevenson, 55. Testimony Rebuttal - DOC Landi, 56. Testimony Rebuttal - Xcel and ITC - Hillstrom, 57. Testimony Rebuttal - Xcel and ITC - Stevenson, 58. Testimony Surrebuttal - North Mankato - Fischer, 59. Testimony Surrerebuttal - DOC Johnson, 60. Testimony Surrerebuttal - Xcel Hillstrom, 61. Testimony Surr-Surrerebuttal - DOC Johnson, 62. Testimony Surr-Surrerebuttal - MISO Zhou, 63. Briefing Papers, 64. Hearing Exhibit - Tuma Package

title

*                     E002,ET6675/CN-17-184;                     Xcel Energy;

                     E002,ET6675/TL-17-185                     ITC Midwest

In the Matter of the Application of Xcel Energy and ITC Midwest LLC for a Certificate of Need and Route Permit for the Huntley-Wilmarth 345 kV Transmission Line Project.

 

1.                     Should the Commission find that the environmental impact statement is adequate?

2.                     Should the Commission adopt the Administrative Law Judge’s Findings of Fact, Conclusion of Law, and Recommendations?

3.                     Should the Commission grant a certificate of need for the Huntley Wilmarth Transmission Line Project?

4.                     Should the Commission issue a route permit identifying a specific route and permit conditions for the Huntley Wilmarth Transmission Line Project? (PUC: DeBleeckere)