Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Bookmark and Share
File #: Details 2021-105    Version: 1 Name:
Type: WS - Wind Power Plant Siting Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 5/13/2021 In control: PUC Agenda Meeting
On agenda: 6/10/2021 Final action:
Title: * IP7046/WS-20-860 Northern Wind Energy Redevelopment, LLC In the Matter of the Application for a Site Permit Amendment to Decommission the Existing Chanarambie and Viking Wind Facilities and Construct the 120-Megawatt Northern Wind Facility in Murray County, Minnesota. 1. Whether the site permit application is substantially complete. 2. Whether the proposed project should be reviewed under the full site permit review process or under the site permit amendment process. 3. Whether the site permit application should be referred to the Office of Administrative Hearings for contested case proceeding. 4. Whether the time limits of certain rules related to the processing of the applications should be varied. (PUC: Ek)
Attachments: 1. 1 NW Application 4-16-21, 2. 2 NW Application 4-16-21, 3. 3 NW Application 4-16-21, 4. 4 NW Application 4-16-21, 5. 5 NW Application 4-16-21, 6. 6 NW Application 4-16-21, 7. 7 NW Application 4-16-21, 8. 8 NW Application 4-16-21, 9. 9 NW Application 4-16-21, 10. 10 NW Application 4-16-21, 11. 12 NW Application 4-16-21, 12. 13 NW Application 4-16-21, 13. 14 NW Application 4-16-21, 14. 15 NW Application 4-16-21, 15. 16 NW Application 4-16-21, 16. PUC Notice 4-23-21, 17. IUOP Local 49 Comment Letter 4-30-21, 18. DOC EERA Comment Letter 5-3-21, 19. LIUNA Comment Letter 5-3-21, 20. MN DNR Comment Letter 5-3-21, 21. Murray Co. Comment Letter 5-4-21, 22. NW Reply Comments 5-13-21, 23. Briefing Papers

title

*                     IP7046/WS-20-860                     Northern Wind Energy Redevelopment, LLC

In the Matter of the Application for a Site Permit Amendment to Decommission the Existing Chanarambie and Viking Wind Facilities and Construct the 120-Megawatt Northern Wind Facility in Murray County, Minnesota.

 

1.                     Whether the site permit application is substantially complete.

2.                     Whether the proposed project should be reviewed under the full site permit review process or under the site permit amendment process.

3.                     Whether the site permit application should be referred to the Office of Administrative Hearings for contested case proceeding.

4.                     Whether the time limits of certain rules related to the processing of the applications should be varied. (PUC: Ek)