File #: Details 2022-007    Version: 1 Name:
Type: RP - Resource Planning Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 1/7/2022 In control: PUC Agenda Meeting
On agenda: 1/27/2022 Final action:
Title: ** E002/RP-19-368 Xcel Energy In the Matter of Xcel Energy's 2020-2034 Integrated Resource Plan. 1. Should the Commission approve, modify, or reject Xcel Energy's Alternate Plan, as described in the Company's June 25, 2021 Reply Comments? 2. If the Commission modifies the Alternate Plan, what modifications should the Commission make? 3. What findings should be made regarding the five-year action plan? 4. Should the life of the Monticello nuclear plant be extended by 10 years and does the Commission need to make that decision at this time and in this docket? 5. Should the Commission approve Xcel's proposal to build transmission tie-lines from the Sherco and King sites that can interconnect wind and solar resources? 6. Should the Commission adopt a proposed alternative plan under Minnesota Rules 7843.0300, subp. 11? 7. What resource acquisition process(es) should Xcel use to implement the approved resource plan? 8. When should Xcel file its next IRP? (PUC: Stalpes, Terwilliger)
Attachments: 1. PUBLIC Initial Filing - Cover Through Appendix F7 7-1-19.pdf, 2. PUBLIC Initial Filing - Appendix G1 Through L 7-1-19, 3. PUBLIC Initial Filing - Appendix M Through N1 7-1-19.pdf, 4. PUBLIC Initial Filing - Appendix N2 Through N8 7-1-19.pdf, 5. Initial Filing - Appendix N9 Part 1 7-1-19.pdf, 6. Initial Filing - Appendix N9 Part 2 7-1-19.pdf, 7. Initial Filing - Appendix N9 Part 3 7-1-19.pdf, 8. Initial Filing - Appendix N10 Through P1 7-1-19.pdf, 9. Initial Filing - Appendix P2 Through P3 7-1-19.pdf, 10. PUBLIC Initial Filing - Appendix Q Through S 7-1-19.pdf, 11. PUBLIC Xcel Supp to Resource Plan 6-30-20.pdf, 12. Xcel Errata to Supplement 8-25-20.pdf, 13. IBEW Locals 23, 160, 949 Comments 3-17-20.pdf, 14. 1 NNG Comments Ex 1 - 3 - 2-8-21.pdf, 15. 2 NNG EX 3 - APP A PART 1 OF 3 2-8-21.pdf, 16. 3 NNG EX 3 - APP A PART 2 OF 3 2-8-21.pdf, 17. 4 NNG EX 3 - APP A PART 3 OF 3 2-8-21.pdf, 18. CAE Comments 2-10-21.pdf, 19. 1 PUBLIC CEO Comments 2-11-21.pdf, 20. 3 PUBLIC CEO Comments 2-11-21.pdf, 21. 5 PUBLIC CEO Comments 2-11-21.pdf, 22. 7 PUBLIC CEO Comments 2-11-21.pdf, 23. Cty of Mnpls Comments 2-11-21.pdf, 24. PUBLIC DSP Comments 2-11-21.pdf, 25. 1 CUB Comments 2-11-21.pdf, 26. 2 CUB Comments 2-11-21.pdf, 27. PUBLIC DOC Comments 2-11-21.pdf, 28. PUBLIC Sierra Club Comments 2-11-21.pdf, 29. XLI Comments 2-11-21.pdf, 30. Sierra Club Att C - 2-11-21.pdf, 31. DOC Letter 2-11-21.pdf, 32. CUB Errata re Initial Comments 6-25-21.pdf, 33. IBEW Locals 23, 160, 949 Comments 3-23-20.pdf, 34. CAE Reply Comments 6-24-21.pdf, 35. DSP Reply Comments 6-25-21.pdf, 36. Cty of Mnpls Reply Comments 6-25-21.pdf, 37. CUB Reply Comments 6-25-21.pdf, 38. PUBLIC Sierra Club Reply Comments 6-25-21.pdf, 39. NNG Reply Comments 6-25-21.pdf, 40. DOC DER Reply Comments 6-25-21.pdf, 41. 2 PUBLIC CEO Reply Comments Att 1-EFG - 6-25-21.pdf, 42. 3 PUBLIC CEO Reply Comments Supp Att 1-EFG - 6-25-21.pdf, 43. XLI Reply Comment w Ex B Reply Report 6-25-21.pdf, 44. PUBLIC Xcel Reply Comments 6-25-21.pdf, 45. Xcel Errata to Reply Comments 8-19-21.pdf, 46. PUBLIC OAG-RUD Revised Reply Comments 12-7-21.pdf, 47. PUBLIC Sierra Club Supp Comments 10-15-21.pdf, 48. PUBLIC OAG Supp Comments 10-15-21.pdf, 49. CUB Supp Comments 10-15-21.pdf, 50. DSP Supp Comments 10-15-21.pdf, 51. 2 PUBLIC CEO Supp Comments Att 1 - 10-15-21.pdf, 52. 4 PUBLIC CEO Supp Comments Att 2 - 10-15-21.pdf, 53. DOC Supp Comments 10-15-21.pdf, 54. PUBLIC CEO Supp Comments 10-15-21.pdf, 55. XLI Supp Comments w Ex C - 10-15-21.pdf, 56. CAE Supp Comments 10-15-21.pdf, 57. Cty of Mnpls Supp Comments 10-15-21.pdf, 58. Litty Solar Energy Releaf Participant Comments 10-24-19.pdf, 59. H Salgado Participant Comments 10-29-19.pdf, 60. OAH Participant Comment 12-18-19.pdf, 61. Wright Co - Participant Comment 12-2-20.pdf, 62. Cty of Brnsvll Participant Comments 12-17-20.pdf, 63. Brnsvll Chamber of Commerce Participant Comments 12-23-20.pdf, 64. Sustainable Growth Participant Comments 1-12-21.pdf, 65. Prairie Island Indian Comm Participant Comments 1-15-21.pdf, 66. Goodhue Co Brd of Comm Participant Comments 1-25-21.pdf, 67. St. Paul Area Chamber Comments 1-28-21.pdf, 68. Wright Co Participant Comments 2-8-21.pdf, 69. Cty of Becker Participant Comments 2-10-21.pdf, 70. LiUNA Participant Comments 2-11-21.pdf, 71. CUC Participant Comments 2-11-21.pdf, 72. Wulling Participant Comments 2-11-21.pdf, 73. Eefa Partners Participant Comments 2-11-21.pdf, 74. CEEMn Participant Comments 2-11-21.pdf, 75. SP350 Participant Comments 2-11-21.pdf, 76. Cty of Monticello Participant Comments 2-11-21.pdf, 77. MIEDC Participant Commetns 2-12-21.pdf, 78. IUOE Local 49 Participant Comments 4-12-21.pdf, 79. IUOE Local 49 Participant Reply Comments 6-24-21.pdf, 80. As You Sow et al Participant Reply Comments 6-25-21.pdf, 81. US Solar Participant Reply Comments 6-25-21.pdf, 82. Becker Twnshp Participant Reply Comments 6-25-21.pdf, 83. CUC Participant Reply Comments 2-11-21.pdf, 84. CEJC Participant Reply Comments 6-25-21.pdf, 85. EWCA Participant Comments Reply Comments 6-25-21.pdf, 86. MLC Reply Participant Comments 6-25-21.pdf, 87. SP350 Participant Reply Comments 6-25-21.pdf, 88. LiUNA Participant Reply Comments 6-28-21.pdf, 89. Schoennauer Paricipant Supp Comments 10-15-21.pdf, 90. SP350 Participant Supp Comments 10-15-21.pdf, 91. Cty of Red Wing Participant Supp Comments 10-15-21.pdf, 92. CUC Participant Supp Comments 10-15-21.pdf, 93. ICSR et al Participant Supp Comments 10-15-21.pdf, 94. Wulling Participant Supp Comments 10-15-21.pdf, 95. PUC Participant Supp Comments 10-18-21.pdf, 96. Cty of SP Participant Supp Comments 10-18-21.pdf, 97. 1 Emmer Participant Supp Comments 10-18-21.pdf, 98. 2 Emmer Participant Supp Comments 10-18-21.pdf, 99. LiUNA Participant Supp Comments 10-18-21.pdf, 100. MLC Reply Participant Supp Comments 10-18-21.pdf, 101. PUC Order 12-6-21.pdf, 102. DOC Letter 7-25-19.pdf, 103. Cty of Mnpls Comments 7-31-19.pdf, 104. Xcel Letter 10-8-19.pdf, 105. XLI Response 10-16-21.pdf, 106. CEO Response 10-18-19.pdf, 107. CUB Response 10-16-19.pdf, 108. PUC Order 11-12-19.pdf, 109. Xcel Motion 8-13-21.pdf, 110. DOC Letter 8-26-21.pdf, 111. OAG-RUD Response 8-27-21.pdf, 112. ILSR Vote Solar Petition 11-2-21.pdf, 113. PUC Order 12-6-21.pdf, 114. Briefing Papers, 115. Distributed Solar Parties Proposed Decision Option 1-24-22, 116. CUB Notice of Errata 1-24-22, 117. DOC Letter 1-26-22, 118. CUB Letter 1-26-22, 119. City of Mpls Comments 1-26-22, 120. CEO Letter 1-26-22, 121. XLI Letter 1-26-22, 122. Sierra Club & DSPS Letter 1-26-22, 123. Ditributed Solar Parties Letter 1-26-22, 124. OAG RUD Letter 1-26-22, 125. Revised Decision Options, 126. Revised Decision Options - Feb 2 Version, 127. Proposed Decision Options-Commissioner Schuerger, 128. Revised Decision Option D-Commissioner Tuma, 129. Revised Decision Option D18-Commissioner Tuma, 130. Alternate Decision Option-Commissioner Tuma, 131. Partial List of Decision Options-Chair Sieben

title

**                     E002/RP-19-368                     Xcel Energy

In the Matter of Xcel Energy’s 2020-2034 Integrated Resource Plan.

 

1.                     Should the Commission approve, modify, or reject Xcel Energy’s Alternate Plan, as described in the Company’s June 25, 2021 Reply Comments?

2.                     If the Commission modifies the Alternate Plan, what modifications should the Commission make?

3.                     What findings should be made regarding the five-year action plan? 

4.                     Should the life of the Monticello nuclear plant be extended by 10 years and does the Commission need to make that decision at this time and in this docket?

5.                     Should the Commission approve Xcel’s proposal to build transmission tie-lines from the Sherco and King sites that can interconnect wind and solar resources?

6.                     Should the Commission adopt a proposed alternative plan under Minnesota Rules 7843.0300, subp. 11?

7.                     What resource acquisition process(es) should Xcel use to implement the approved resource plan?

8.                     When should Xcel file its next IRP? (PUC: Stalpes, Terwilliger)