|
|
File #:
|
Details 2022-212
Version:
|
Name:
|
|
|
Type:
|
TL - Transmission Line
|
Status:
|
Agenda Ready
|
|
On agenda:
|
9/7/2023
|
Final action:
|
|
|
Title:
|
* ET2/TL-22-235 Great River Energy
In the Matter of the Application of Great River Energy for a Route Permit to Rebuild the Existing 69 kV ST-WW Transmission Line to 115 kV in Stearns County, Minnesota.
1. Should the Commission adopt the Administrative Law Judge's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendation?
2. Should the Commission find that the Environmental Assessment and the record created at the public hearing adequately address the issues identified in the scoping decision?
3. Should the Commission require the use of an Independent Third-Party Monitor to assist DOC EERA and Commission staff in monitoring compliance of construction and restoration activities of the project?
4. Should the Commission issue a Route Permit identifying a specific route and permit conditions to rebuild the existing 69 kV ST-WW Transmission Line to 115 kV in Stearns County? (PUC: Panait)
|
|
Attachments:
|
1. GRE 1 Application 8-25-22, 2. GRE 2 Application 8-25-22, 3. GRE 3 Application 8-25-22, 4. GRE 4 Application 8-25-22, 5. PUC Notice 9-6-22, 6. Public Comment City of St. Cloud 9-12-22, 7. MNDNR Comments 9-20-22, 8. MNDOT Comments 9-20-22, 9. DOC Comments 9-20-22, 10. GRE Reply Comments 9-27-22, 11. DOC Supp Comments 10-4-22, 12. PUC Notice of Public Info Meeting 11-21-22, 13. PUC Order 11-21-22, 14. GRE Pre-Scoping Supp Filing and Att A-F 11-22-22, 15. PUC Sample Permit 12-5-22, 16. MNDOT Comments 12-21-22, 17. MNDNR Comments 12-29-22, 18. GRE Scoping Summary 12-29-22, 19. DOC Scoping Summary Report 1-19-23, 20. DOC Scoping Decision for EA 1-31-23, 21. PUC Notice of Public Hearing 5-1-23, 22. DOC EA and Att 5-1-23, 23. DOC EA Att A 5-1-23, 24. DOC EA Att B 5-1-23, 25. DOC EA Att C 5-1-23, 26. DOC EA Att D1 5-1-23, 27. DOC EA Att D2 5-1-23, 28. DOC EA Att D3 5-1-23, 29. DOC EA Att D4 5-1-23, 30. DOC EA Att D5 5-1-23, 31. GRE 1 Direct Testimony of Mark Strohfus 5-3-23, 32. GRE 2 Direct Testimony of Mark Strohfus 5-3-23, 33. GRE Supplemental Testimony and Schedule B 5-5-23, 34. MNDNR Comments 6-1-23, 35. DOC Comments 6-1-23, 36. GRE Reply Comments and proposed FofF 6-6-2023, 37. DOC Response to Reply Comments 6-16-23, 38. GRE Combined Exhibit List 8-3-23, 39. OAH FofF, Cof L, Recommendation 8-4-23, 40. GRE Letter on ALJ FofF Report 8-11-23, 41. DOC Response to ALJ's Report 8-11-23, 42. Briefing Papers with Attachment
|
title
* ET2/TL-22-235 Great River Energy
In the Matter of the Application of Great River Energy for a Route Permit to Rebuild the Existing 69 kV ST-WW Transmission Line to 115 kV in Stearns County, Minnesota.
1. Should the Commission adopt the Administrative Law Judge's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendation?
2. Should the Commission find that the Environmental Assessment and the record created at the public hearing adequately address the issues identified in the scoping decision?
3. Should the Commission require the use of an Independent Third-Party Monitor to assist DOC EERA and Commission staff in monitoring compliance of construction and restoration activities of the project?
4. Should the Commission issue a Route Permit identifying a specific route and permit conditions to rebuild the existing 69 kV ST-WW Transmission Line to 115 kV in Stearns County? (PUC: Panait)
|