Skip to main content
Meeting Name: PUC Agenda Meeting Agenda status: Final
Meeting date/time: 12/21/2023 10:00 AM  
Meeting location:
Published agenda: Agenda Agenda Published minutes: Minutes Minutes  
Meeting video:  
Attachments:
File #Ver.Agenda #NameTypeTitleActionAction Details
Details 2021-291 41. GR - General RatePULLED * E002/GR-21-630 Northern States Power Company d/b/a Xcel Energy In the Matter of the Application by Northern States Power Company d/b/a Xcel Energy for Authority to Increase Rates for Electric Service in the State of Minnesota. 1. Should the Commission grant the participant compensation request of the Energy CENTS Coalition? 2. Should the Commission grant the participant compensation request of Just Solar Coalition Intervenors Community Power and Minnesota Interfaith Power & Light? (PUC: Moe)  Action details
Details 2023-200 12. M - Miscellaneous* G002/M-23-77; Xcel Energy-Gas; G008/M-23-79; CenterPoint Energy; G011/M-23-80; Minnesota Energy Resources Co.; G004/M-23-78; Great Plains; G022/M-23-81 Greater Minnesota Gas In the Matter of Xcel Energy’s, Center Point Energy’s, Greater Minnesota Gas’, Great Plains’, and Minnesota Energy Resources’ Service Quality Report. Should the Commission accept Xcel Energy’s, CenterPoint Energy’s, Greater Minnesota Gas’, Great Plains’, and Minnesota Energy Resources’ 2022 Service Quality Reports? (PUC: Harsch)  Action details
Details 2023-202 13. CI - Commission Initiated Investigation* G002,G022,G004, All Natural Gas Companies G011,G008/CI-22-548 In the Matter of an Exploration of Comparative Performance Metrics and Improvements to Natural Gas Service Quality Reports. (PUC: Harsch)  Action details
Details 2023-201 14. M - Miscellaneous* E002/TL-22-132 Xcel Energy In the Matter of the Route Permit Application for the Minnesota Energy Connection Project in Sherburne, Stearns, Kandiyohi, Wright, Meeker, Chippewa, Yellow Medicine, Renville, Redwood, and Lyon counties in Minnesota. 1. Should the Commission accept the route permit application as substantially complete and authorize review under the full permitting process? 2. What actions, if any, should the Commission take concerning the hearing process and other procedural items? 3. Should the Commission appoint an advisory task force? 4. Should the Commission authorize the Executive Secretary to issue an authorization to the applicant to initiate consultation with the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office? (PUC: Ek)  Action details