|
Details 2014-151
| 7 | 1. | | TL - Transmission Line | * E015/TL-14-21 Minnesota Power
In the Matter of the Application of Minnesota Power for a Route Permit for the 500 kV Great Northern Transmission Line Project in Roseau, Lake of the Woods, Beltrami, Koochiching and Itasca Counties.
Should the Commission approve the minor alteration request?
If the minor alteration is approved, should any conditions be required? (PUC: Kaluzniak) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2016-202
| 1 | 2. | | WS - Wind Power Plant Siting | * IP6646/WS-16-618 Red Pine Wind Farm, LLC
In the Matter of the Application of Red Pine Wind Farm, LLC for a Site Permit for the 200.1 Megawatt Red Pine Wind Project in Lincoln County, Minnesota.
Should the Commission make a preliminary determination whether a site permit should be issued or denied? (PUC: Kaluzniak) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2016-213
| 1 | 3. | | AI - Affiliated Interest | * G011/AI-16-284 Minnesota Energy Resources Corporation
In the Matter of the Petition for Approval of the Affiliated Interest Agreement with WEC Energy Group and Minnesota Energy Resources Corporation. (PUC: Kaml, Bender; DOC: Kamara) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2014-031
| 12 | 4. | | M - Miscellaneous | ** E002/M-13-867 Northern States Power Co. d/b/a Xcel Energy
In the Matter of the Petition of Xcel Energy for Approval of its Proposed Community Solar Garden Program.
Should the Commission reconsider its August 16, 2024 Order which denied the reconsideration of the its May 30, 2024 Order approving the Community Solar Garden Program Rate Transition Proposal with Modifications? (PUC: Brown-Huss)
The Commission has the authority to accept or decline a petition for reconsideration with or without a hearing or oral argument (Minnesota Rules 7829.3000, Subpart 6). In other words, a decision on a petition for reconsideration can be made without taking oral comments at the Commission meeting. | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2016-212
| 1 | 5. | | C - Complaint | ** E123/CG-16-241 Minnesota Valley Cooperative Light & Power Association
In the Matter of a Complaint of Larry Fagen against Minnesota Valley Cooperative Light & Power Association.
Can a cooperative electric association require a customer to be compensated via the “kWh carry forward” method under Minn. Stat. §216B.164 Subd. 3(f)?
If a customer installed a solar system prior to July 1, 2015 and expanded it after July 1, 2015, is all, part, or none of the combined system subject to the 2015 amendments to Minn. Stat. §216B.164?
Is Minnesota Valley Cooperative Light & Power Association’s minimum bill discriminatory against customers with distributed generation?
If the Commission finds in favor of Mr. Fagen on any of the issues, what are the appropriate remedies? (PUC: Gonzalez) | |
Action details
|