|
Details 2014-031
| 28 | 1. | | M - Miscellaneous | ** E002/M-13-867 Northern States Power Co. d/b/a Xcel Energy
In the Matter of the Petition of Xcel Energy for Approval of its Proposed Community Solar Garden Program.
Should the Commission reconsider its August 16, 2024 Order which denied the reconsideration of the its May 30, 2024 Order approving the Community Solar Garden Program Rate Transition Proposal with Modifications? (PUC: Brown-Huss)
The Commission has the authority to accept or decline a petition for reconsideration with or without a hearing or oral argument (Minnesota Rules 7829.3000, Subpart 6). In other words, a decision on a petition for reconsideration can be made without taking oral comments at the Commission meeting. | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2021-170
| 1 | 2. | | C - Complaint | ** E002/C-21-125 Northern States Power Company dba Xcel Energy
In the Matter of the Formal Complaint and Request for Expedited Relief by SunShare, LLC Against Northern States Power Company dba Xcel Energy regarding OsterSun Project.
What action should the Commission take regarding SunShare’s request for a variance from Xcel Tariff Sheet 9-64.1a regarding the applicable VOS (Value of Solar) rate for all five of the SunShare Projects? (PUC: Duran) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2021-171
| 1 | 3. | | C - Complaint | PULLED
** E002/C-21-126 Northern States Power Company dba Xcel Energy
In the Matter of the Formal Complaint and Request for Expedited Relief by SunShare, LLC Against Northern States Power Company dba Xcel Energy regarding CleodSun Project.
What, if any, action should the Commission’s investigation of SunShare LLC’s Formal Complaint against Xcel Energy regarding the CleodSun Project take at this time? (PUC: Rosier) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2019-219
| 3 | 4. | | CN - Certificate of Need | IP6997/CN-18-699; Plum Creek Wind Farm, LLC
IP6997/WS-18-700;
IP6997/TL-18-701
In the Matter of the Applications of Plum Creek Wind Farm, LLC for a certificate of Need, Site Permit, and Route Permit for an up to 414 MW Large Wind Energy Conversion System and 345 kV Transmission Line in Cottonwood, Murray, and Redwood Counties.
1. Should the Commission approve Plum Creek’s request to amend the Certificate of Need for the Plum Creek Project?
2. Should the Commission approve Plum Creek’s request to amend the site permit for the Plum Creek Project?
3. Should the Commission approve Plum Creek’s request to amend the route permit for the Plum creek Wind Project?
4. If the amendments are authorized, what additional conditions, if any, should the Commission impose? (PUC: Harvieux; DOC: Steinhauer) | |
Action details
|