|
Details 2018-038
| 4 | 1. | | CI - Commission Initiated Investigation | P407,405/CI-18-122; Frontier Communications of Minnesota, Inc.;
P407,405,5316/ Frontier Communications of America, Inc.;
CI-21-150 Citizens Telecommunications of MN LLC
In the Matter of a Commission Inquiry into the Service Quality, Customer Service, and Billing Practices of Frontier Communications;
In the Matter of a Commission Inquiry into Frontier Communications’ Virtual Separation Analysis.
Should the Commission find that Frontier provided the required information on actual capital expenditures, planned investment, and staffing to satisfy annual reporting requirements in 2025 as required by the May 24, 2022, Compliance Order? (PUC: McShane; DOC: Gonzalez, Straiton) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2019-001
| 1 | 2. | | M - Miscellaneous | ** P6995/M-18-653; LTD Broadband, LLC
P999/CI-18-634
In the Matter of LTD Broadband LLC’s Petition for Eligible Telecommunications Carrier (ETC) Designation in Minnesota;
In the Matter of a Notice to Connect America Fund II (CAF II) Grant Winners.
Should the Commission approve LTD’s Request for ETC status for high cost support in the Census Blocks listed in the docket? (PUC: Fournier) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2019-002
| 1 | 3. | | M - Miscellaneous | ** P6186/M-18-661; Midcontinent Communications
P999/CI-18-634
In the Matter of Midcontinent Communications’ Petition for Eligible Telecommunications Carrier (ETC) Designation in Minnesota;
In the Matter of a Notice to Connect America Fund II (CAF II) Grant Winners.
Should the Commission approve Midcontinent Communications’ Request for ETC status for high cost support in the Census Blocks listed in the docket? (PUC: Fournier) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2019-003
| 1 | 4. | | M - Miscellaneous | ** P6994/M-18-665; Broadband Corp.
P999/CI-18-634
In the Matter of Broadband Corp.’s Petition for Eligible Telecommunications Carrier (ETC) Designation in Minnesota;
In the Matter of a Notice to Connect America Fund II (CAF II) Grant Winners.
Should the Commission approve Broadband Corp.’s Request for ETC status for high cost support in the Census Blocks listed in the docket? (PUC: Fournier) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2019-004
| 1 | 5. | | M - Miscellaneous | ** P5891/M-18-675; Jaguar Communications
P999/CI-18-634
In the Matter of Jaguar Communications’ Petition for Eligible Telecommunications Carrier (ETC) Designation in Minnesota;
In the Matter of a Notice to Connect America Fund II (CAF II) Grant Winners.
Should the Commission approve Jaguar Communications’ Request for ETC status for high cost support in the Census Blocks listed in the docket? (PUC: Fournier) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2019-005
| 1 | 6. | | M - Miscellaneous | ** P6996/M-18-679; Roseau Electric Cooperative, Inc.
P999/CI-18-634
In the Matter of Roseau Electric Cooperative, Inc.’s Petition for Eligible Telecommunications Carrier (ETC) Designation in Minnesota;
In the Matter of a Notice to Connect America Fund II (CAF II) Grant Winners.
Should the Commission approve Roseau Electric Cooperative, Inc.’s Request for ETC status for high cost support in the Census Blocks listed in the docket? (PUC: Fournier) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2018-279
| 1 | 7. | | CI - Commission Initiated Investigation | * P999/CI-18-634;
P432/M-18-549; Wikstrom Telephone Company;
P431/AM-18-601; West Central Telephone;
P432/AM-18-605; Paul Bunyan Telephone Cooperative;
P409/AM-18-607; Garden Valley Telephone Cooperative;
P530/M-18-626; Halstad Telephone Company;
P523/AM-18-630; Federated Telephone Cooperative;
P515/AM-18-637; Interstate Telecommunications Cooperative;
P406/AM-18-645; Consolidated Telephone Company;
P522/AM-18-718 Farmers Mutual Telephone Company
In the Matter of Petitions for Eligible Telecommunications Carrier (ETC) Designation in Minnesota.
1. Should the Commission approve the requests for ETC designation in Minnesota?
2. Should the Commission deem any other actions appropriate? (PUC: McCarthy) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2015-262
| 3 | 8. | | TL - Transmission Line | ** ET2/TL-15-628 Great River Energy
In the Matter of the Application of Great River Energy for a Route Permit for the Bull Moose 115 kV Transmission Line Project in Cass County.
1. Should the Commission approve and adopt proposed findings of Fact and Conclusions for the Bull Moose 115 kV Transmission Line?
2. Should the Commission find that the environmental assessment and the record created at the public hearing adequately address the issues identified in the scoping decision?
3. Should the Commission issue a final route permit for the Bull Moose 115 kV Transmission Line Project? (PUC: Panait) | |
Action details
|