Meeting Name: PUC Agenda Meeting Agenda status: Final
Meeting date/time: 12/12/2024 10:00 AM  
Meeting location:
Published agenda: Agenda Agenda Published minutes: Not available  
Meeting video:  
Attachments:
File #Ver.Agenda #NameTypeTitleActionAction Details
Details 2024-198 11. SA - Service Area* E002,111/SA-24-347 Northern States Power Co. d/b/a Xcel Energy; Dakota Electric Assoc. In the Matter of a Compensation and Orderly Transfer Agreement between Northern States Power Co. d/b/a Xcel Energy and Dakota Electric Assoc. Should the Commission Approve the Service Territory Transfer? (PUC: Noyce; DOC: Bologna)  Action details
Details 2024-201 12. SA - Service Area* E002,257-SA-24-348 Northern States Power Co. d/b/a Xcel Energy; City of Kasson In the Matter of a Compensation and Orderly Transfer Agreement between Northern States Power Co. d/b/a Xcel Energy and City of Kasson. Should the Commission Approve the Service Territory Transfer? (PUC: Noyce; DOC: Bologna)  Action details
Details 2024-070 23. PPL - Petroleum Pipeline** IP7093/PPL-22-422 Summit Carbon Solutions, LLC In the Matter of the Application of Summit Carbon Solutions, LLC, for a Routing Permit for the Otter Tail to Wilkin Carbon Dioxide Pipeline Project in Otter Tail and Wilkin Counties, Minnesota. 1. Should the final environmental impact statement be found to be adequate? 2. Should Summit be granted a route permit for its proposed CO2 pipeline project? 3. If a routing permit is granted, which route alternative should be selected? 4. If Summit is granted a routing permit, what permit conditions are appropriate? (PUC: Janezich)  Action details
Details 2024-202 14. GR - General Rate** E002/GR-24-320; Northern States Power Co. d/b/a Xcel Energy E002/M-24-321 In the Matter of the Application of Xcel Energy for Authority to Increase Rates for Electric Service in Minnesota. 1. Does Xcel Energy’s application comply with the filing requirements of Minn. Stat. § 216B.16, Minn. Rules, parts 7825.3100 to 7825.4400, other relevant Minnesota statutes and Commission rules, and relevant Commission Orders? 2. Should this matter be sent to the Office of Administrative Hearings for a contested case hearing and if so, what should be the scope of the hearing? 3. Are there other issues or concerns related to this matter? (PUC: Manning, Andringa, Larson, Marcus, Pham, Ubani, Willette, Worlobah)  Action details