Skip to main content
Meeting Name: PUC Agenda Meeting Agenda status: Final
Meeting date/time: 6/5/2025 10:00 AM  
Meeting location:
Published agenda: Agenda Agenda Published minutes: Minutes Minutes  
Meeting video:  
Attachments:
File #Ver.Agenda #NameTypeTitleActionAction Details
Details 2025-093 11. RV - Revocation Investigation** P6883/RV-24-408 Q-Link Wireless, LLC In the Matter of the Petition of the Minnesota Department of Commerce for Revocation of the Eligible Telecommunications Carrier Status of Q Link Wireless, LLC pursuant to Minn. R. 7812.1400, subp. 15. Should the Commission grant the request of the Minnesota Department of Commerce to revoke Q Link Wireless, LLC’s Lifeline ETC designation? (PUC: Fournier)  Action details
Details 2024-110 12. TL - Transmission LineIP7114/GS-23-414; Iron Pine Solar Power, LLC IP7114/TL-23-415 In the Matter of Iron Pine Solar Power, LLC’s Joint Application for a Site Permit and Route Permit for a 325 MW Solar Energy Generation System and a 230 kV HVTL Gen-Tie Line in Pine County, Minnesota. 1. Does the permit amendment request application contain the information required in Minn. R. 7850.4900? 2. Should the Commission grant the requested site permit amendment to Iron Pine Solar? 3. Are there other issues or concerns related to this matter? (PUC: Eknes; PUC EIP: Kirsch)  Action details
Details 2025-055 13. M - Miscellaneous* E017/M-24-404 Otter Tail Power Co. In the Matter of Otter Tail Power Co.’s Petition for Approval of the Solway and Abercrombie Solar Projects; In the Matter of the Petition of Otter Tail Power Co. for Exemption from Certificate of Need for the 50 MW Solway Solar Project in Beltrami County, Minnesota. 1. Should the Commission approve Otter Tail Power’s investments in the Solway and Abercrombie solar projects? 2. Should the Commission determine that the Projects qualify for application toward Otter Tail Power’s Eligible Energy Technology Standard and Carbon-Free Standard obligations? 3. Should the Commission authorize future cost recovery of the Projects through the Renewable Resources Cost Recovery Rider, subject to Commission review and approval of specific costs to be presented in a future petition? 4. Should the Commission limit cost recovery to a capital cost cap? If so, how should the Commission set the cap? 5. Should the Commission authorize Otter Tail Power to charge its Minnesota ratepayers for North Dakota’s share of the solar projects? (PUC: Stalpes)  Action details